Attention: Answers.ros.org is deprecated as of August the 11th, 2023. Please visit robotics.stackexchange.com to ask a new question. This site will remain online in read-only mode during the transition and into the foreseeable future. Selected questions and answers have been migrated, and redirects have been put in place to direct users to the corresponding questions on Robotics Stack Exchange. Additional details are available here.

robot_localization IMU TF

asked 2017-09-07 04:11:26 -0600

MIN LATT
51 ●17 ●21 ●26

Dear all, If I use robot_localization with 9 Degrees of Freedom - Razor IMU, do I need to provide TF between base link and imu link? Is TF between base_link and imu_link important for robot_localization internal processing?

Since this IMU uses three different chips for an accelerometer, gyroscope and magnetometer, which sensor's location will determine the TF value?

Based on this Q &A, we may need to mount IMU to be aligned with base_link. In that case, how should I align this IMU due to three separate chips locations in the PCB?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

have you had this working?

aarontan ( 2018-08-08 11:43:00 -0600 )edit

add a comment

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2017-09-07 05:21:57 -0600

Humpelstilzchen

1504 ●4 ●20 ●21

updated 2017-09-07 05:27:14 -0600

Yes, you need a transform. Your IMU could be e.g. rotated 90 degree by the z axis, the robot_localization node needs to know that.

Since the IMU is all about rotation and not translation the exact offset between all sensors probably doesn't matter, so just use the center of the razor board.

The documentation explains on how to align the razor imu (connector to the front, parts upwards).

edit flag offensive delete link

add a comment

Question Tools

2 followers

Stats

Asked: 2017-09-07 04:11:26 -0600

Seen: 2,432 times

Last updated: Sep 07 '17

robot_localization IMU TF edit

Comments

1 Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

robot_localization IMU TF