using smach with actionlib
When using smach with actionlib actions, am I correct in saying that smach acts as the action client for the action server? So I don't need a separate action client anymore?
ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | Q&A answers.ros.org |
When using smach with actionlib actions, am I correct in saying that smach acts as the action client for the action server? So I don't need a separate action client anymore?
That is correct, if you use a simple action state Smach will construct the action client for you.
Similarly, when you create a action server wrapper for a Smach container, Smach will construct the action server for you.
Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.
Asked: 2011-02-27 19:53:27 -0600
Seen: 915 times
Last updated: Feb 28 '11