ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | Q&A answers.ros.org
Ask Your Question
0

what would happen if GPS is missing, while using robot_localization pkg

asked 2021-08-17 01:54:43 -0500

Delbina gravatar image

hi everyone,

I want to know if I use three instances of the robot_localization package, what would happen if in some parts of the path the GPS is missing or limited, what would happen to the robot localization? does it able to do navigation? the idea of applying two controllers, is it applicable to this situation?

https://github.com/nickcharron/waypoi...

http://docs.ros.org/en/melodic/api/ro....

thanks

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
0

answered 2021-08-17 15:12:07 -0500

updated 2021-08-17 15:13:34 -0500

If GPS is missing then you will rely on continuous sensory data such as wheel odometry+Imu, despite being able to deal with accumulative drift errors, GPSs are not always reliable under bad weather or poor connection conditions. Depending on quality and setup of your GPS device you may also get constant jumps around. Robot localization package wiki explains this thoroughly, you are encouraged to take a look into Integrating GPS data section. As final word to your question, do your navigation and planning on continuous data instance of EKF, in that case even you miss some signals from GPS, the system still should be able to function

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Dear @Fetullah Atas, thanks a lot for your answer, one more question, if I use slam as the provider of the map for robot_localization pkg (I have already put the publish_tf_map in a false mode in SLAM setting), then How the switch from GPS to SLAM (for navigation) happen? thanks

Delbina gravatar image Delbina  ( 2021-08-17 16:00:51 -0500 )edit
1

If you find the answer useful please do upvote and mark it as accepted. For your follow up question, do you mean you set publish tf of EKF instance to false or SLAM ?

If you mean you disabled publish tf for SLAM, that’s good as it wouldn’t conflict with tf that’s being published by robot localization. Does your slam publish some sort of odometry or pose message ? If yes, you can input that as another source to EKF node, as for the switching, I am Not entirely sure about that but to my understanding, if you are fusing odometry/gps and odometry/slam into same instance, robot localization should be able to use what’s available, so I am not sure if a switching mechanism is required.

Fetullah Atas gravatar image Fetullah Atas  ( 2021-08-17 16:14:48 -0500 )edit

yes, i disabled publish_tf in SLAM, actually I am using RTABMAP and it publishes odometry information as well as pose. in which part of robot_localization i can give these data as input?! you mean, for example, instead of /warthog_velocity_control/odom , should I put /rtabmap/odom?! then what about the matrix? it will remain unchanged?

Delbina gravatar image Delbina  ( 2021-08-17 16:43:14 -0500 )edit

Append the slam odometry to existing list. so if you have warthog/odom as odom0, create another set of configuration with odom1. As for the matrix, select the true for the states that you think slam does a good job estimating. E.g x and v velocities.

Fetullah Atas gravatar image Fetullah Atas  ( 2021-08-18 01:18:02 -0500 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2021-08-17 01:54:43 -0500

Seen: 105 times

Last updated: Aug 17 '21