ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2023-03-09 22:05:12 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2020-10-23 15:47:14 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2018-08-02 05:51:04 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-07-07 06:10:54 -0500 | commented question | Moveit gdb debugging Are you sure you're using ROS2? Is there MoveIt available for ROS2 already? It's just to make sure. I am working with RO |
2018-07-07 06:07:15 -0500 | answered a question | Moveit gdb debugging Unfortunately I don't have a solution, but I'm dealing with the same issue. It is really confusing and there seems to be |
2018-06-30 08:32:08 -0500 | commented question | ZED camera not opening .... (roslaunch command) Can you check whether you have libcuda.so.1 in your /opt/ros/<ROS_DISTRO e.g. kinetic>/lib? |
2018-06-28 15:24:28 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-06-21 06:33:00 -0500 | commented answer | Connecting custom IK with MoveIt! Thanks so much for your help! That's just the kind of pointer I needed. |
2018-06-21 06:30:37 -0500 | marked best answer | Connecting custom IK with MoveIt! Hi everybody, I am recently struggling with implementation of IK for my robot arm. It's a 4DOF uArm robot (link here), with deterministic IK solutions. I'm working with ROS Kinetic and MoveIt. I have generated an IkFast plugin, but I'm having issues implementing it, because the last joint of my robot arm is not actuated (check the link attached). This seems to confuse MoveIt! and I have not been able to find a solution. It was already brought up in this question. I was researching the option of using a mimic joint, but it doesn't seem to resolve the issue plus it would have to mimic two joints at the same time (joint4 = 0.15707 + joint1 - joint2). As a matter of fact, I don't actually need such a sophisticated system as IkFast, since the joint values are deterministic for each location. I actually have the IK equations and a C++ implementation. I could use this as an IK, but I don't know how to connect it to MoveIt. I was checking the old tutorial for creating a custom constrained_ik, but it seems to no longer be relevant. I am after any hint as for where to look. If you have any idea what is the nature of a connection between the IK solver package and MoveIt, what kind of connection and/or message is being used between the two or where I can access such information. I have tried checking a IkFast solution and reverse engineering it, but it's a bit too complicated for my understanding. Can't find which part is actually receiving and sending the solution. |
2018-06-21 04:27:06 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-06-20 04:13:41 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-06-20 02:12:42 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2018-06-07 06:52:53 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-06-02 13:27:40 -0500 | asked a question | Connecting custom IK with MoveIt! Connecting custom IK with MoveIt! Hi everybody, I am recently struggling with implementation of IK for my robot arm. It |
2018-05-18 03:40:18 -0500 | commented answer | ros does not show any debug messages Did you try to check settings (the gray cogwheel in the top left corner). In there you can set logging level for each no |
2018-05-18 03:36:41 -0500 | commented answer | ros does not show any debug messages Did you try to check settings (somewhere in the bottom left corner probably) ? It's a white star in a blue field probabl |
2018-05-16 00:02:20 -0500 | edited answer | ros does not show any debug messages You could try to set a logging level for your package to debug by adding the following configuration file (don't forget |
2018-05-16 00:02:20 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2018-05-16 00:00:21 -0500 | edited answer | ros does not show any debug messages You could try to set a logging level for all your environment to debug by adding the following configuration file: # Ov |
2018-05-15 23:35:22 -0500 | answered a question | ros does not show any debug messages You could try to set a logging level for all your environment to debug by adding the following configuration file: # Ov |
2018-05-14 09:18:00 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2018-04-09 21:07:02 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-04-09 14:08:38 -0500 | marked best answer | (Python) Simple Action Server - register_goal_callback executes unexpectedly I'm trying to write a simple action server using the goal callback method as described in the tutorial in C++ over here, however I'm trying to rewrite it in Python. If it works, I would definitely suggest it as an addition to the I have put together more or less the whole thing, but clearly I'm missing something essential around the registration of the callbacks. As soon as I call the I suppose this is not meant to be happening, but I'm not sure what am I doing wrong.
(there is more code, but I don't think that's relevant anymore) I have gone through the simple_action_callback.py to figure out why it is getting called, but I'm not sure I get what's going on because I'm probably missing out something with the goal registration. All that's written there is this : Which would make me think that it would stay registered and activate only when a new goal arrives. But it activates immediately. Moreover a condition I hope this is not too verbose. I can edit it down if needed. FYI I'm using
|
2018-04-09 14:08:38 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2018-04-09 14:08:37 -0500 | commented answer | (Python) Simple Action Server - register_goal_callback executes unexpectedly Yes! That's it. Thanks so much! I feel so stupid now, but this is genuinely a great help. |
2018-04-08 16:09:58 -0500 | asked a question | (Python) Simple Action Server - register_goal_callback executes unexpectedly (Python) Simple Action Server - register_goal_callback executes unexpectedly I'm trying to write a simple action server |
2018-04-05 09:15:39 -0500 | commented answer | compile error for actionlib fibonacciServer.cpp tutorial Update from the future :-). The empty class constructor is actually supposed to be a class desctructor with the tilde so |
2018-04-05 09:14:59 -0500 | commented answer | compile error for actionlib fibonacciServer.cpp tutorial Update from the future :-). The empty class constructor is actually supposed to be a class desctructor and the tilde cle |
2018-04-05 09:11:55 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2018-03-08 05:50:05 -0500 | commented answer | SolidWorks->urdf exporter strange behavior when click "Preview and Export..." If you need more detailed description, leave me a message on the blog and I'll put up some pictures there as well. |
2018-03-08 05:48:00 -0500 | commented answer | SolidWorks->urdf exporter strange behavior when click "Preview and Export..." After you have generated the joint origins, they will appear in the left widget where you have all the other objects. So |
2018-03-04 06:49:12 -0500 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
2018-03-04 06:49:12 -0500 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2017-08-21 17:57:45 -0500 | commented answer | SolidWorks->urdf exporter strange behavior when click "Preview and Export..." Unfortunately the same problem happened to me even with the newest version (as of August 2017). It's already been raised |
2017-08-21 17:57:45 -0500 | answered a question | SolidWorks->urdf exporter strange behavior when click "Preview and Export..." Despite being an old thread, this issue seems to be reappearing. I've spent quite a lot of time researching an answer, s |