Which 6D pose estimation package works best and will be supported?

asked 2011-04-08 09:36:22 -0600

sdavies
88 ●6 ●7 ●11

updated 2014-01-28 17:09:30 -0600

ngrennan
1 ●1 ●1

I have seen several different solutions to 6D pose estimation in ROS/opencv:

checkerboard_detector

checkerboard_detector2

checkerboard_pose_estimation

datamatrix

fiducial

datamatrix seems less accurate than the checkerboard approach, but the checkerboard packages seem to no longer be supported. The fiducial package seems new (used in the tod_training contest), but there is no documentation.

Is willow/openCV settling on the fiducial package? I'd like to choose the one that works best right now and also won't disappear any time soon... Thanks!

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

add a comment

3

answered 2011-04-11 07:39:35 -0600

Julius
955 ●31 ●45 ●56

We have used fiducial markers from tod_training for collecting training data and pose estimation and it worked fine so far (using object_recognition in SVN 50321).

edit flag offensive delete link

add a comment

2

answered 2011-04-11 05:02:00 -0600

Ivan Dryanovski

4954 ●52 ●70 ●86 http://robotics.ccny.cuny.edu/

You can check out ar_pose, as well as ar_pose_ekf, for a 6D pose estimation using single or multiple AR markers.

edit flag offensive delete link

add a comment

1

answered 2011-04-11 02:51:34 -0600

Felix Endres

6468 ●28 ●57 ●93 http://www.informatik....

I had no success with "checkerboard_detection" in February but was assured by the author, they would update the software "after some time". Haven't tried since.

checkerboard_detector2 works for me.

edit flag offensive delete link

add a comment

Which 6D pose estimation package works best and will be supported?

3 Answers

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

Which 6D pose estimation package works best and will be supported? edit

3 Answers

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

Which 6D pose estimation package works best and will be supported?