Attention: Answers.ros.org is deprecated as of August the 11th, 2023. Please visit robotics.stackexchange.com to ask a new question. This site will remain online in read-only mode during the transition and into the foreseeable future. Selected questions and answers have been migrated, and redirects have been put in place to direct users to the corresponding questions on Robotics Stack Exchange. Additional details are available here.

tf::Stamped<tf::Pose> vs geometry_msgs::PoseStamped

asked 2021-11-17 02:21:50 -0500

skpro19

310 ●35 ●65 ●58 https://twitter.com/skpro19

What is the difference between tf::Stamped<tf::Pose> and geometry_msgs::PoseStamped types? When should we use one over the other?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

add a comment

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2021-11-18 08:13:07 -0500

fergs

13902 ●59 ●157 ●196 http://www.robotandchisel.com

Under the hood, the two messages have very similar fields. Generally, the TF message is only used when dealing with TF. The geometry_msgs messages are easier to visualize in tools like RVIZ, hence they would be the preferred message unless you are trying to put the message into the TF API.

edit flag offensive delete link

add a comment

Question Tools

3 followers

Stats

Asked: 2021-11-17 02:21:50 -0500

Seen: 255 times

Last updated: Nov 18 '21

tf::Stamped<tf::Pose> vs geometry_msgs::PoseStamped edit

1 Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

tf::Stamped<tf::Pose> vs geometry_msgs::PoseStamped