Attention: Answers.ros.org is deprecated as of August the 11th, 2023. Please visit robotics.stackexchange.com to ask a new question. This site will remain online in read-only mode during the transition and into the foreseeable future. Selected questions and answers have been migrated, and redirects have been put in place to direct users to the corresponding questions on Robotics Stack Exchange. Additional details are available here.

Can the camera position be specified in an SDF file? [closed]

asked 2012-07-09 10:26:25 -0500

Jim Rothrock

792 ●17 ●29 ●39

updated 2014-01-28 17:12:57 -0500

ngrennan
1 ●1 ●1

I am converting a Gazebo 0.x world file into Gazebo 1.x SDF format. In the original file, I was able to specify the initial camera position like this:

<rendering:gui>
  <frames>
    <row height="100%">
      <camera width="100%">
        <xyz>85.52 3.6 1.92</xyz>
        <rpy>0 23.8 69.9</rpy>
      </camera>
    </row>
  </frames>
</rendering:gui>

Does SDF provide similar functionality? I can't find any in the SDF documentation.

edit retag flag offensive reopen merge delete

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by Jim Rothrock
close date 2013-10-07 07:38:46

add a comment

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2012-08-02 15:03:17 -0500

Jim Rothrock

792 ●17 ●29 ●39

I looked through the Gazebo 1.0.2 source files, and found that the initial camera pose can be specified like this:

<gui>
  <camera name="user_camera">
    <origin pose="85.52 3.6 1.92 0 0.4154 1.22"/>
  </camera>
</gui>

edit flag offensive delete link

add a comment

Question Tools

Stats

Asked: 2012-07-09 10:26:25 -0500

Seen: 779 times

Last updated: Aug 02 '12

Can the camera position be specified in an SDF file? [closed] edit

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by Jim Rothrock close date 2013-10-07 07:38:46

1 Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

Can the camera position be specified in an SDF file? [closed]

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by Jim Rothrock
close date 2013-10-07 07:38:46