Is threading necessary in long callback function

asked 2021-01-13 16:11:28 -0600

TheMilkman92
23 ●4 ●5 ●10

updated 2021-01-13 16:12:45 -0600

Hey,

So I was wondering if within a ROS node, a callback function were to take 3 seconds to execute a task, would the whole node be held up by this? Or is it threaded in some way by default.

For this application I have a bump sensor on the front of my robot, and was hoping to do some obstacle avoidance if something was hit. For example, reverse, turn, try again. And I was going to hard code a sequence like that into my GNC system, but it would be good if the node isn't locked up for that time period. I was also hoping to ramp motor velocity up and down when a change in speed or direction is required, I guess that also ties into this question.

Thanks for any help in advance!

Comments

This actually sounds like a good candidate for actions

jayess ( 2021-01-13 22:45:45 -0600 )edit

Yeah wow, that is a great idea. I wish I thought of a fair few hours ago... sometimes I overlook the most obvious solutions, thanks for the input.

TheMilkman92 ( 2021-01-13 23:19:42 -0600 )edit

add a comment

answered 2021-01-13 20:20:51 -0600

Rufus
1083 ●45 ●102 ●89

updated 2021-01-13 20:22:49 -0600

ros::spinOnce (and by extension ros::spin()) is single threaded by default. Your callbacks are handled one by one when ros::spinOnce is called so if your callback takes 3 seconds, ros::spinOnce will be stuck for 3 seconds before proceeding (which also means it other callbacks cannot run). You can use the MultiThreadedSpinner or AsyncSpinner if you want to avoid that, but that obviously means you'll have to do proper thread synchronization in your callbacks. You may also want to tune your subscriber queue size if your data is arriving faster than your callbacks can process.

More information: http://wiki.ros.org/roscpp/Overview/C...

There are also many questions here and on stackoverflow regarding ROS's AsyncSpinner that you can search for.

edit flag offensive delete link

Comments

Yeah okay, interesting. I was looking into potentially using asyncSpinner but it didn't seem like there was much in the way of functionality past having threaded callbacks.

Would another solution to this be starting a boost thread that can get interrupted by additional data that might be useful? For example if the IMU notices that robot is being lifted the current thread can be interrupted, the wheels can stop, can start a different sequence or something like that?

Sorry if this seems like a silly question, don't have much experience when it comes to threading etc.

TheMilkman92 ( 2021-01-13 20:42:50 -0600 )edit

I don't think you have much control over the threads that run the callbacks (the ones created by asyncSpinner). Common practice is to have callbacks save / set the latest state (which should be quick and hardly blocking), and have another thread that checks the state and does the required computation / actuation.

Rufus ( 2021-01-13 22:53:38 -0600 )edit

add a comment

Is threading necessary in long callback function

Comments

1 Answer

Comments

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

Is threading necessary in long callback function edit

Comments

1 Answer

Comments

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

Is threading necessary in long callback function