ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question
1

robot_localization Ouputs NaNs when IMU/Odom messages not NaNing, works in RobotPoseEKF

asked 2017-10-03 20:01:18 -0600

updated 2017-10-04 13:10:43 -0600

Hi,

I have a standard configuration for robot_localization to give me a odom->base_footprint transform. We have been using this sensor data and transformations with robot_pose_ekf for over a year now with no issues. When migrating to robot_localization, randomly, after some inconsistent period of time, the entire /odometry/filtered message becomes filled with nans. This happens with no changes in the odom or imu messages (not giving out nans, nothing out of the ordinary here). It has occurred before adding lidar_odometry (odom0).

We get errors about TF_NAN_INPUT and TF_DENORMALIZED_QUATERNION from using the output /odometry/filtered (because their filled with nans when we populate the TF messages) to update TF outside of robot_localization.

I have included example imu and odom messages, all fields of them are being actively published without any NaNs. I also added the normal robot_localization output and what our nan message looks like, with the robot_localization_config.yaml file.

Any thoughts?

odom (odom1) message from wheel encoders

       header: 
      seq: 176323
      stamp: 
        secs: 1507078251
        nsecs: 535428047
      frame_id: odom
    child_frame_id: base_footprint
    pose: 
      pose: 
        position: 
          x: 0.0
          y: 0.0
          z: 0.0
        orientation: 
          x: 0.0
          y: 0.0
          z: 0.0
          w: 1.0
      covariance: [1e-06, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1e-06, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1e-06, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1000000.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1000000.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1000.0]
    twist: 
      twist: 
        linear: 
          x: 0.0
          y: 0.0
          z: 0.0
        angular: 
          x: 0.0
          y: 0.0
          z: 0.0
      covariance: [1e-06, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1e-06, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1e-06, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1e-06, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1e-06, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.001]

imu message from imu

    header: 
      seq: 157520
      stamp: 
        secs: 1507078338
        nsecs: 195523977
      frame_id: imu_link
    orientation: 
      x: 0.0101925589928
      y: -0.00273427809162
      z: -0.501709473646
      w: 0.864971814291
    orientation_covariance: [1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06]
    angular_velocity: 
      x: 0.0
      y: 0.0
      z: 0.0
    angular_velocity_covariance: [1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06]
    linear_acceleration: 
      x: -0.0453446374339
      y: 0.177417214661
      z: 9.64665574154
    linear_acceleration_covariance: [1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06, 1e-06]

normal robot_localization output

header: 
  seq: 78377
  stamp: 
    secs: 1507078377
    nsecs: 253389359
  frame_id: odom
child_frame_id: base_footprint
pose: 
  pose: 
    position: 
      x: -0.000973945901217
      y: 0.126273200099
      z: -1.61762382101e-17
    orientation: 
      x: -0.000105876156922
      y: -0.000161010011301
      z: 3.51162535183e-06
      w: 0.999999981427
  covariance: [9.997287159166042e-07, 5.664801003518761e-29, -2.1928212327851335e-23, 1.995211302619292e-21, 1.9952112977467756e-21, 1.9952112987625185e-21, 5.66480204376903e-29, 9.997287159166042e-07, -1.0024367487167898e-23, 4.133819569988897e-21, 4.133819559834025e-21, 4.133819561950336e-21, -2.192821232213108e-23, -1 ...
(more)
edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

Did you check the imu & odom inputs on the exact time when robot_localization outputs NaN values? I recommend to use bag files to analyze the messages.

Humpelstilzchen gravatar image Humpelstilzchen  ( 2017-10-05 03:10:33 -0600 )edit

Also the covariances are really small (arithmetic errors?), how do you get that accurate odometry?

Humpelstilzchen gravatar image Humpelstilzchen  ( 2017-10-05 03:16:11 -0600 )edit

There are no NaNs anywhere in any of the inputs to robot_localization, I have checked with multiple bag files. Nothing on the inputs are out of the ordinary as far as I can tell in values, normalization, rates, frames, delay, etc. Which covariances are you refering to? EKF, odom, or IMU?

stevemacenski gravatar image stevemacenski  ( 2017-10-05 16:42:52 -0600 )edit

All covariances. IMU and ODOM are both 0.000001, that is about micrometer accuracy. And the output of robot_localization is even lower. In your initial_estimate_covariance I even see multiple 1e-9.

Humpelstilzchen gravatar image Humpelstilzchen  ( 2017-10-05 22:45:16 -0600 )edit

They are accurate, those numbers could use some tuning but I just used some defaults for those to get robot_localization off the ground. These are the same values that have worked with robot pose ekf for over a year now, however. Would robot_localization create NaNs here where robot pose ekf didnt?

stevemacenski gravatar image stevemacenski  ( 2017-10-06 02:36:09 -0600 )edit

Can you post a bag file that includes this happening? The only time I have ever seen NaN values is through sensor data or ill-conditioned covariance matrices.

Tom Moore gravatar image Tom Moore  ( 2017-10-12 19:55:28 -0600 )edit

Also, what is publishing the transform to the IMU frame?

Tom Moore gravatar image Tom Moore  ( 2017-10-12 19:58:49 -0600 )edit

I don't have a bag file off hand but from the ill-conditioned covariances clicks well. I'm starting to run it today with updated covariances (IMU only on main diagonal, odom not 1e-6) and I'll update back if the issue resumes

stevemacenski gravatar image stevemacenski  ( 2017-10-17 00:50:31 -0600 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2017-10-12 20:12:19 -0600

Tom Moore gravatar image

I’d have to see a bag to be sure, but your IMU covariance matrices are definitely ill-conditioned. Try to invert a 3x3 matrix where all the values are the same:

https://m.matrix.reshish.com/inverse.php

You need to put zeros in the off-diagonal entries.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Thanks! I'm recording a bag file right now with the new rational covariances. If it comes back, I'll post the bag file, but I do expect this to resolve the problem since I have noted the error in the inverse - section of the code. If it turns out to be the case, I'll PR a ROS_WARN for it.

stevemacenski gravatar image stevemacenski  ( 2017-10-17 00:52:04 -0600 )edit

Excellent, thanks very much for contributing. If you find the issue is solved, would you mind marking this answer as accepted? Thanks!

Tom Moore gravatar image Tom Moore  ( 2017-10-17 06:54:17 -0600 )edit

Sorry to get back to you so late, but it did solve my problem. I am PRing now some log statements to detect this issue since it appears to be very common

stevemacenski gravatar image stevemacenski  ( 2018-02-12 18:01:54 -0600 )edit

Question Tools

2 followers

Stats

Asked: 2017-10-03 20:01:18 -0600

Seen: 2,049 times

Last updated: Oct 12 '17