ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question

are Gazebo IMU's measures sufficiently good ?

asked 2015-04-28 04:42:50 -0500

user gravatar image

updated 2015-04-30 11:01:06 -0500

gvdhoorn gravatar image

Hello I used morse (simulator) in order to simulate a car with IMU inside. I found that IMU's measures was not good when I integrated them. because :

  1. Frequency (100 Hz) wasn't respected
  2. Gravity wasn't stable,
  3. I think values on all axes were also bad and unrealistic

Do you think that you simulator can do better ?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete


@user: I've changed the title of your question to better reflect the contents. Gazebo is not 'our' (ROS's) simulator, but actually only one of many you can use. For Gazebo specific questions, I'd recommend you use

gvdhoorn gravatar image gvdhoorn  ( 2015-04-30 11:04:20 -0500 )edit

thank you :)

user gravatar image user  ( 2015-05-06 12:35:26 -0500 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted

answered 2015-04-30 02:01:06 -0500

There are also simulated IMUs in Gazebo that you could try out. Integrating IMU data for a prolonged amount of time only really works well for high grade systems such as those used in the aerospace industry. It might be (not sure) that MORSE deliberately adds noise to the simulated measurements to provide more realistic simulation of lower cost IMUs, as these are far more common for robotics use.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Question Tools

1 follower


Asked: 2015-04-28 04:42:50 -0500

Seen: 289 times

Last updated: Apr 30 '15