Ask Your Question
0

Which is the better option for NAO using ROS? [closed]

asked 2014-03-24 01:25:29 -0600

PabloM gravatar image

updated 2014-03-25 02:27:08 -0600

NAO with ROS, Following the tutorials and searching in the forum I found there are 2 main options: 1- ROS on a remote PC and 2- ROS directly on the robot. But, for the option 1, also there are 2 more options: 1.1 Python nodes (install precompiled binaries) and 1.2 C++ nodes (source install from repository). In my case I finally could installed and tested the 1.1 option. For curiosity and to learn more about ROS I want to tackle the 1.2 and 2 options. The questions are: What are the advantages and disadvantages of these 3 options? Which is the better option? Why? Sorry for my question! but, in my specific case I was lost in the 1.1 and 1.2 options while I was following the respective tutorial.

Thank you!

edit retag flag offensive reopen merge delete

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by Vincent Rabaud
close date 2014-08-01 05:14:44.044103

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2014-03-24 10:20:19 -0600

severin gravatar image

Options 1.1 and 1.2 do not change much: where did you read about them? in any case, the easiest path is simply to install the pre-compiled ROS packages as explained here.

The second option (ROS on Nao) is very different: you get an autonomous ROS system. The installation is however much more involving.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Thank you for your time Severin! I'm going to continue using the python nodes. Now I don't know how to start the nao_camera node?. I will put in another question.

PabloM gravatar imagePabloM ( 2014-03-25 06:24:49 -0600 )edit

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2014-03-24 01:25:29 -0600

Seen: 220 times

Last updated: Mar 25 '14