Which is the better option for NAO using ROS? [closed]

asked 2014-03-24 01:25:29 -0600

PabloM
1 ●2 ●3 ●4

updated 2014-03-25 02:27:08 -0600

NAO with ROS, Following the tutorials and searching in the forum I found there are 2 main options: 1- ROS on a remote PC and 2- ROS directly on the robot. But, for the option 1, also there are 2 more options: 1.1 Python nodes (install precompiled binaries) and 1.2 C++ nodes (source install from repository). In my case I finally could installed and tested the 1.1 option. For curiosity and to learn more about ROS I want to tackle the 1.2 and 2 options. The questions are: What are the advantages and disadvantages of these 3 options? Which is the better option? Why? Sorry for my question! but, in my specific case I was lost in the 1.1 and 1.2 options while I was following the respective tutorial.

Thank you!

edit retag flag offensive reopen merge delete

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by Vincent Rabaud
close date 2014-08-01 05:14:44.044103

add a comment

Comments

Thank you for your time Severin! I'm going to continue using the python nodes. Now I don't know how to start the nao_camera node?. I will put in another question.

PabloM ( 2014-03-25 06:24:49 -0600 )edit

add a comment

Which is the better option for NAO using ROS? [closed]

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by Vincent Rabaud
close date 2014-08-01 05:14:44.044103

1 Answer

Comments

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

Which is the better option for NAO using ROS? [closed] edit

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by Vincent Rabaud close date 2014-08-01 05:14:44.044103

1 Answer

Comments

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

Which is the better option for NAO using ROS? [closed]

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by Vincent Rabaud
close date 2014-08-01 05:14:44.044103