ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2017-05-25 18:41:40 -0500 | received badge | ● Taxonomist |
2013-05-15 02:42:17 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2013-05-06 00:25:11 -0500 | commented answer | Why do the features of pcl_ros decrease I appreciate your detailed answer. But I want to know whether ros-perception really have a will to merge our pull request if it is good. I want to avoid needless bother. Thanks. |
2013-05-05 18:26:11 -0500 | answered a question | Why do the features of pcl_ros decrease I appreciate your detailed answer. But I want to know whether ros-perception really have a will to merge our pull request if it is good. I want to avoid needless bother. Thanks. |
2013-05-05 09:48:21 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2013-05-05 07:11:06 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-05-05 04:56:31 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2013-05-04 18:05:35 -0500 | asked a question | Why do the features of pcl_ros decrease Hi. Now we have a mind to rearrange our pcl ros wrappers, jsk_pcl_ros(http: //sourceforge.net/p/jsk-ros-pkg/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/jsk_pcl_ros/), and to send our features to the upstream,https:// github.com/ros-perception/perception_pcl/tree/fuerte-devel/pcl_ros. But when I see the code of pcl_ros, I feel that the features of the codes are decreasing as the branches of pcl_ros are updated. For example, perception_pcl/pcl_ros/src/{segmentation,surface} are lost. We are also lost about that. If we send a pull request to bring back the lost features, does ros-perception accept it? And if we send our features to them, does they accept it? What is the policy of maintenance of pcl_ros? Sorry for my strange English. Thanks. |