ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question

Fedor's profile - activity

2018-07-17 12:17:16 -0500 received badge  Famous Question (source)
2018-06-26 14:37:10 -0500 received badge  Famous Question (source)
2018-05-24 01:21:48 -0500 received badge  Enthusiast
2018-05-22 07:30:46 -0500 commented answer Costmap shows free space as obstacles

Neither Grid/MaxDepth nor Grid/RangeMax haven't changed cut up distance - maybe problem somewhere else. I have added rta

2018-05-22 07:29:47 -0500 commented answer Costmap shows free space as obstacles

Neither Grid/MaxDepth nor Grid/RangeMax haven't changed cut up distance - maybe problem somewhere else. I have added rta

2018-05-22 07:28:46 -0500 commented answer Costmap shows free space as obstacles

Neither MaxDepth nor RangeMax haven't changed cut up distance - maybe problem somewhere else. I have added rtabmap_ros/o

2018-05-22 07:18:45 -0500 marked best answer Costmap shows free space as obstacles

Hi everyone! I am trying to use navigation stack on quadcopter equipped with kinect sensor at Gazebo simulation. I am using grid_map topic of rtabmap_ros package as map for navigation of UAV which hovers at 1.5 m over ground. But global_costmap and local_costmap both show free space on proj_map as obstacles (proj_map, global_costmap). How can I fix it?

Costmap common params:

footprint: [[-0.2,-0.2],[-0.2,0.2], [0.2, 0.2], [0.2,-0.2]]
inflation_radius: 0.65
cost_scaling_factor: 10.0

obstacle_layer:
  obstacle_range: 5.5
  raytrace_range: 6.0
  max_obstacle_height: 0.7
  track_unknown_space: true

  observation_sources: point_cloud_sensor
  point_cloud_sensor: {
    sensor_frame: quad/camera__link,
    data_type: PointCloud2,
    topic: /quad/camera_/depth/points,
    marking: true,
    clearing: true
  }

Global costmap params:

global_costmap:
  global_frame: /map
  robot_base_frame: /base_link
  update_frequency: 1.0
  publish_frequency: 1.0
  static_map: false
  plugins:
     - {name: obstacle_layer, type: "costmap_2d::ObstacleLayer"}

Local costmap params:

local_costmap:
  global_frame: /map
  robot_base_frame: /base_link
  update_frequency: 5.0
  publish_frequency: 2.0
  static_map: false
  rolling_window: true
  width: 5.0
  height: 5.0
  resolution: 0.02
  tranform_tolerance: 0.5
  planner_frequency: 1.0
  planner_patiente: 5.0
  plugins:
     - {name: obstacle_layer, type: "costmap_2d::ObstacleLayer"}
2018-05-22 07:18:45 -0500 received badge  Scholar (source)
2018-05-21 03:54:37 -0500 commented answer Costmap shows free space as obstacles

I deleted parameter Vis/MaxDepth and added Grid/RangeMax with a value of 9, but cloud is still being cut up to 4 meters.

2018-05-21 03:47:21 -0500 commented answer Costmap shows free space as obstacles

Speaking about grid_map: I deleted parameter Vis/MaxDepth and added Grid/RangeMax with a value of 9, but cloud is still

2018-05-21 03:27:18 -0500 received badge  Notable Question (source)
2018-05-21 02:14:18 -0500 commented answer Costmap shows free space as obstacles

Speaking about grid_map: I deleted parameter Vis/MaxDepth and added Grid/RangeMax with a value of 9, but cloud is still

2018-05-21 02:07:57 -0500 commented answer Costmap shows free space as obstacles

Thank you for answer. So, my issue is related to costmaps: global and local costmaps show free space at grid_map as obst

2018-05-21 01:09:44 -0500 received badge  Supporter (source)
2018-05-20 11:35:42 -0500 received badge  Popular Question (source)
2018-05-20 03:09:00 -0500 commented question Costmap shows free space as obstacles

Sure. Screenshot of the Gazebo environment, rtabmap.db

2018-05-18 03:29:49 -0500 asked a question Costmap shows free space as obstacles

Costmap shows free space as obstacles Hi everyone! I am trying to use navigation stack on quadcopter equipped with kinec

2018-05-18 02:59:01 -0500 asked a question Costmap shows free space as obstacle

Costmap shows free space as obstacle Hi everyone! I am trying to use navigation stack on quadrotor equipped with kinect

2018-05-08 07:32:30 -0500 received badge  Notable Question (source)
2018-04-16 09:33:38 -0500 commented question No transform to fixed frame [odom]

Thank you, I will write a node. But I don't understand why does /odom node is published by Gazebo? There is no odom publ

2018-04-16 08:25:58 -0500 commented question No transform to fixed frame [odom]

launch-file and robot's xacro-file. Is it enough?

2018-04-16 07:25:47 -0500 commented question No transform to fixed frame [odom]

.launch file and robot's xacro-file

2018-04-16 04:29:36 -0500 received badge  Popular Question (source)
2018-04-16 01:53:38 -0500 commented question No transform to fixed frame [odom]

/odom node is published by /gazebo with header.frame_id = odom, child_frame_id = base_link. How can I change child_frame

2018-04-13 03:24:28 -0500 asked a question No transform to fixed frame [odom]

No transform to fixed frame [odom] I have launched Gazebo with URDF model of wheeled robot. Robot and joint state publis