Ask Your Question
0

invalid perception_pcl repository for fuerte

asked 2013-06-25 02:57:00 -0500

Fabien R gravatar image

The link on the wiki http://www.ros.org/wiki/perception_pcl (page) seems not valid.

Can someone fix it ?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
0

answered 2013-06-25 05:08:57 -0500

Devasena Inupakutika gravatar image

updated 2013-06-25 05:09:27 -0500

Which PCL version you are trying for ? Last friday June 21, fuerte was updated and issues related to pre PCL 1.6 versions were resolved. Hence, this should work fine.

You can install the ros-fuerte-perception-pcl-fuerte-unstable (sudo apt-get install ros-fuerte-perception-pcl-fuerte-unstable) package which adds pcl16 and pcl16_ros packages that track PCL 1.6.

The namespaces, filenames, and everything else have been changed from pcl to pcl16, so you need to make some minor changes to your code. Like pcl::PointCloud<pcl::pointxyzrgb> becomes pcl16::PointCloud<pcl16::pointxyzrgb>. Doing it this way lets the two PCL versions coexist nicely.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

I need to rebuild it from sources.

Fabien R gravatar imageFabien R ( 2013-06-25 06:22:41 -0500 )edit

@Devasena: Do you plan to enable access to the sources via "apt-get source" ?

Fabien R gravatar imageFabien R ( 2013-07-01 03:40:47 -0500 )edit

No, but which PCL version you are trying to install ? " http://www.ros.org/wiki/perception_pcl " link that you are referring to is working fine and is valid.

Devasena Inupakutika gravatar imageDevasena Inupakutika ( 2013-07-01 13:18:42 -0500 )edit

I'm trying to install the source for fuerte. The command fails:\n$ svn co http://svn.pointclouds.org/ros/branches/fuerte/perception_pcl\n svn: Could not open the requested SVN filesystem

Fabien R gravatar imageFabien R ( 2013-07-01 22:03:02 -0500 )edit

The updated debs of ros-fuerte-pcl are available here : " http://50.28.27.175/repos/building/pool/main/r/ros-fuerte-pcl/ " You can download based on the ubuntu distro (lucid, precise or oneiric) you are using.

Devasena Inupakutika gravatar imageDevasena Inupakutika ( 2013-07-02 12:01:03 -0500 )edit

I would have preferred the release for the armhf architecture. Thanks for your effort anyway.

Fabien R gravatar imageFabien R ( 2013-07-03 01:46:17 -0500 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Asked: 2013-06-25 02:57:00 -0500

Seen: 119 times

Last updated: Jun 25 '13