ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question
0

How to combine two topics in one callback (when synchronization is not possible)

asked 2021-04-14 09:30:43 -0500

Kansai gravatar image

updated 2021-04-14 09:48:40 -0500

I made a similar question here as to how to assign a callback to two different topics.

The answer was to use message_filter. I tried it and it worked.

I am trying to do the same with two other types of topics and I got the error:

AttributeError: 'Image' object has no attribute 'header'

I investigated and found that the synchronization uses the time stamp in the headers of the topics. The problem is that now I am using two topics and one of them is a types of messages without headers.

The topic message type ("Image") is

uint64 unique_id
sensor_msgs/CompressedImage image

As you can see it has no headers. (therefore the error "no attribute header")

My question is, is there a way that I can still combine these two topics in one callback?

P.S I have tried to follow the advice of the wiki and use allow_headerless=True but when I do this the callback function never gets called

P.S.2 is this the only way?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

P.S I have tried to follow the advice of the wiki and use allow_headerless=True but when I do this the callback function never gets called

P.S.2 is this the only way?

If using the receipt time instead of a timestamp is acceptable (depends on your application), allow_headerless = True should work, and you can post your code for help troubleshooting. Otherwise, there's no need to modify the publisher directly. If you're really trying to synchronize the messages, the image field of your Image message, should have a header in it as I mentioned below, which is probably what you should use.

tryan gravatar image tryan  ( 2021-04-14 18:43:43 -0500 )edit

I have checked and the image field does seem to have a header filled. I am now learning how to use topic_tools relay to republish... it seems it can be done by a launch file but I wonder if that is possible from the code? mmm it seems relay will only republish the same message... wonder how to publish only the image part...

Kansai gravatar image Kansai  ( 2021-04-14 18:52:38 -0500 )edit

@tryan is there a way to synchronize it with the header of the image part of the message?

Kansai gravatar image Kansai  ( 2021-04-14 18:57:10 -0500 )edit

You could do that if you write a custom message filter, but it would probably be easier to write a node (if topic_tools doesn't work) to republish a message you can use with an existing filter.

tryan gravatar image tryan  ( 2021-04-14 20:17:09 -0500 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2021-04-14 10:31:40 -0500

tryan gravatar image

updated 2021-04-15 09:29:47 -0500

In short, yes. There are multiple ways to approach this depending on how you want to handle the messages. You can always implement your own class that subscribes to both topics, stores the messages, and operates on them as you see fit. On the other end of the spectrum, you may be able to get away with using topic_tools (wiki) to republish the sensor_msgs/CompressedImage (doc), which does have a header, on a new topic and subscribing to that one with a message_filters::Synchronizer (wiki) as before. In between, you may be able to use the message_filter library to implement a custom filter without starting from scratch.

Please, provide more context if you'd like a more specific answer. How do you want to handle the messages if not time-synchronizing them? Do you need the unique_id for processing in the callback?


Update

To clarify the discussion in the comments, @Kansai chose the second option above. There is enough information in the original Image message defined in the question for normal synchronizing with a message_filters::TimeSynchronizer, but that info is not contained in a top-level header as expected.

The message definition contains a field called image of type sensor_msgs/CompressedImage, which in turn contains a header. The chosen solution therefore involves relaying the image field on its own (new) topic as a standalone CompressedImage message, which can work with the TimeSynchronizer.

To achieve the relay, one can use topic_tools/transform in a launch file like so:

<launch>
    <node name="pub" pkg="rostopic" type="rostopic"
        args="pub -r 1 /original_topic test_pkg/Image
            '{unique_id: 0, image: {header: {seq: 0, stamp: {secs: 1, nsecs: 0}, frame_id: 'test_frame'}, format: 'png', data: '[1]'}}'" />

    <node name="relay" pkg="topic_tools" type="transform"
        args="/original_topic /new_topic sensor_msgs/CompressedImage 'm.image'"/>
</launch>

Check output:

$ rostopic echo /new_topic 
header: 
  seq: 1
  stamp: 
    secs: 1
    nsecs:         0
  frame_id: "test_frame"
format: "png"
data: [1]
---

This way the allow_headerless option (which would use receipt time rather than a timestamp) is unnecessary, and better synchronization is possible. Though the relay node introduces some extra delay, it may be negligible for a given application. There are of course alternatives, but I don't want to clutter the discussion more if this solution works for OP.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

I am trying to solve this with topic_tools and it seems that transform would help but it seems this does not work with launch files https://answers.ros.org/question/3496...

Kansai gravatar image Kansai  ( 2021-04-14 19:23:04 -0500 )edit

I tried the "broken" example from your link, and it worked for me:

<launch>
    <node name="pub" pkg="rostopic" type="rostopic" args="pub /foo std_msgs/Float64 0.5 -r 1" />
    <node name="foobar" pkg="topic_tools" type="transform" args="/foo /bar std_msgs/Float64 'm'"/>
</launch>

output:

$ rostopic echo /bar
data: 0.5
---
data: 0.5
---
tryan gravatar image tryan  ( 2021-04-14 20:12:06 -0500 )edit
1

Yeah, I wrote one for my self and it works as well. Thanks for the help!

Kansai gravatar image Kansai  ( 2021-04-14 21:19:37 -0500 )edit

So what is the solution here now?

@Kansai: what was the cause of your callback not getting called?

I'm having a hard time understanding how republish or transform suddenly make this work.

Yeah, I wrote one for my self and it works as well.

then why not post it here as an answer?

gvdhoorn gravatar image gvdhoorn  ( 2021-04-15 01:48:31 -0500 )edit

Question Tools

2 followers

Stats

Asked: 2021-04-14 09:30:43 -0500

Seen: 738 times

Last updated: Apr 15 '21