ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange

Attention: Answers.ros.org is deprecated as of August the 11th, 2023. Please visit robotics.stackexchange.com to ask a new question. This site will remain online in read-only mode during the transition and into the foreseeable future. Selected questions and answers have been migrated, and redirects have been put in place to direct users to the corresponding questions on Robotics Stack Exchange. Additional details are available here.

Revision history [back]

Maybe it's related to version of boost library, but I use boost::bind when I call a method in a c++ class.
In the example you've show, there is no need for a compute_odom() thread. Standard practice in roscpp is to call ros::spin() from main().
I agree with @Teo Cardoso that you should check the length of the array before accessing it.

Maybe it's related to version of boost library, but I use boost::bind for thread create when ~~I call a method in~~ calling a c++ ~~class.~~

method.

In the example you've show, there is no need for a compute_odom() thread. Standard practice in roscpp is to call ros::spin() from main().
I agree with @Teo Cardoso that you should check the length of the array before accessing it.

Maybe it's related to version of boost library, but I use boost::bind for thread create when calling a c++ method.
method.
In the example you've show, there is no need for a compute_odom() thread. Standard practice in roscpp is to call ros::spin() from main().

I agree with @Teo Cardoso that you should check the length of the array before accessing it.

ROS Answers is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.

Powered by Askbot version 0.10.2