ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2022-08-23 10:13:27 -0500 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2012-12-14 12:12:07 -0500 | answered a question | ROS fuerte installation problem on 12.04 Same problem on Ubuntu 12.04 i386... The only package group I was able to install was ros-fuerte-ros-common The individual ROS stacks are present, but not the package group. |
2012-11-16 10:39:52 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2012-11-16 10:39:52 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2012-09-17 22:27:36 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2012-09-09 21:49:01 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2012-09-09 21:49:01 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2012-09-09 21:49:01 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2012-07-31 00:47:54 -0500 | received badge | ● Taxonomist |
2012-07-24 02:32:23 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2012-07-17 12:54:50 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2011-12-17 07:36:28 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2011-09-01 15:44:01 -0500 | answered a question | rxgraph graph not visible on Arch I have the same problem. I don't think it is due to conflicts between different versions of python. $ sudo pacman -Ql wxpython This command will list all the files installed for wxpython, and you should notice that everything is installed in the python2 site-package directory. I tried using the latest version of rxgraph from the developer, to no avail. I believe the problem has to due with cairo and pycairo. You can try installing a local copy of an earlier version of cairo and pycairo (e.g. 1.8). Use the same version that Ubuntu uses. I haven't tried this myself, as I don't need the diagrams badly enough... |
2011-08-17 20:31:23 -0500 | marked best answer | Preserving changes to standard ROS packages When you update your source based ROS installation it won't overwrite your changes, at worst you would have to merge the changed files manually if there are any conflicts (see rosinstall documentation). But things like CMakeList doesn't change very often. Another thing to do is submit patches to package maintainers, so that your changes can be integrated and whenever next version is released it will just work out of the box. |
2011-07-13 14:02:02 -0500 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2011-07-13 10:42:30 -0500 | answered a question | Preserving changes to standard ROS packages Hmm... I just did a rosinstall update. My changes seems to be intact so far. Most of the changes I am making are to make ROS packages compile with gcc-4.6. I have submitted patches to https://code.ros.org/trac/ros-pkg/, though nothing seems to be happening with them. Other changes I had to make are due to locations of header files, which are system specific, so I doubt the package maintainers would want them. |
2011-07-13 10:24:06 -0500 | answered a question | Love Arch Linux, but won't behave with ROS I don't like waiting for updates on Ubuntu either. The main problems you will face for working with ROS on Archlinux are:
The fix is to preferentially use python2 in lieu of python and gcc-4.5 in lieu of gcc-4.6. You would want to put the last line in an initialization script that you run every time before using ROS in a new terminal. Don't add this to your /etc/profile.d/ as it will break some packages in Archlinux. Additionally, the dependencies are not detected very well, so you have to determine which libraries are missing from the error logs. For more information, see my other post. Edit: Promoting gcc-4.5 and g++-4.5 does not appear to work, as configure refers to them by the exact path: /usr/bin/gcc Instead, you have to edit the CMakeLists.txt file for each package that fails to compile with gcc 4.6. Add the following lines after the rosbuild directives (if any). |
2011-07-12 12:53:31 -0500 | answered a question | Specifying non-standard library path Using environmental variables does not appear to work... In the end, I had to change CMakeLists.txt. |
2011-07-12 11:14:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2011-07-12 11:08:21 -0500 | asked a question | Preserving changes to standard ROS packages Archlinux, kernel 2.6.39-ARCH In order to compile some packages, I need to patch certain source codes and make changes to CMakeList.txt... How do I preserve these changes so that when I update ROS by: ... I don't have to re-make the changes again. |
2011-07-10 08:54:02 -0500 | asked a question | Specifying non-standard library path How do I specify a non-standard library path while building a standard ROS package? I tried: which did not work. Archlinux 2.6.39-ARCH |
2011-07-10 08:20:35 -0500 | answered a question | Problem installing openni_camera (pcl) and openni_tracker (kdl) on Archlinux Regarding one of the compilation errors above: pcl compilation error Patch and ticket submitted to https://code.ros.org/trac/ros-pkg/ticket/5054 pcl_ros also had problems with gcc 4.6. In the end, I had to specify the compiler as gcc-4.5 and g++-4.5, by adding after the rosbuild directives in CMakeLists.txt for pcl_ros. As for kdl, the patches are already applied, but the Makefile is trying to apply the patch again. The fix is to remove the patching line in the Makefile of the kdl package. |
2011-07-10 07:30:07 -0500 | answered a question | Problem installing openni_camera (pcl) and openni_tracker (kdl) on Archlinux "samurai" is actually just the name of my computer. I am using Archlinux with linux kernal 2.6.39. I am using the diamondback ROS release with the latest update by rosinstall. For the error involving the pcl package, I had googled that error, though without success. I checked the manifest.xml of pcl. The only independent system dependency is libqhull, which I have installed. And all the other ROS package dependencies (cminpack, eigen, flann) have all been built. Some people have a similar error while compiling another C++ library, and it appeared to be an issue with compiling directives... Which version of gcc does ROS recommend? I can't seem to find this information anywhere. How can you use another gcc version, if you have it installed? As for kdl, the manifest description reads This package contains a recent version of the Kinematics and Dynamics Library (KDL), distributed by the Orocos Project. For stability reasons, this package is currently locked to revision 31715 of April 26 2010 (C-turtle) and revision 30401 of August 8 2009 (Boxturtle), but this revision will be updated on a regular basis to the latest available KDL trunk. This ROS package does not intend to modify KDL in any way, it simply provides a convenient way to download and compile the library, because KDL is not available from an OS package manager. However, this package might contain some temporary patches to KDL while they are being applied upstream, or while a permanent fix for a problem is being discussed by the KDL community. What I can't figure out is why the 4 patches to kdl failed, as described in my original post. Is it system specific? |
2011-07-09 13:52:47 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2011-07-09 13:51:48 -0500 | asked a question | Problem installing openni_camera (pcl) and openni_tracker (kdl) on Archlinux (more) |