avzmpy's profile - activity

Node( package='nav2_planner', executable='planner_server', name='planner_server', output='screen', parameters=[configured_params], remappings=remappings),

How would you set the debug log level here?

I'm calling client now function while constructing the node, but this value is still zero:

now().seconds(); // 0 always (only in constructor) for some reason

Is it intended behaviour? I'm using simulation time. Later, when calling same exact function in a method, it returns correct time value.

I would like to call multiple action servers with a single client, however, with the current rclcpp implementation server name is only passed in the constructor, so the only option currently seems to be maintaining a number of client instances with dedicated names. It would seem that having one instance and calling multiple servers should be the optimal way of doing it, maybe by passing an additional argument to async_send_goal function. Am I missing something?

Are there any ways of achieving this with the current implementation of rclcpp?

ROS2 one action client calling multiple servers I would like to call multiple action servers with a single client, howev

ROS2 one action client calling multiple servers I would like to call multiple action servers with a single client, howev

Why does Galactic release has so short life compared to Foxy? As stated https://docs.ros.org/en/galactic/Rele... Foxy EOL is in 2023, while the more recent release is supported only until 2022?

ROS2 Galactic EOL Why does Galactic release has so short life compared to Foxy? As stated https://docs.ros.org/en/galact

I've experienced the same behavior. There is a major bug in Foxy version at least. Robot plans straight through obstacle

I've experienced the same behavior. There is a major bug in Foxy version at least. Robot plans straight through obstacle

I've experienced the same behavior. There is a major bug in Foxy version at least. Robot plans straight through obstacle

But if you have a segmented plane (coinciding with base_footrpint more or less) those outliers should be filtered out by

a robot is aware of its footprint frame, so anything below that is basically below the ground

you could segment out the ground with RANSAC and assume that all outliers below the plane are hole points

What are appropriate use cases for each one?

ros2 difference between colcon test and launch_test What are appropriate use cases for each one?

ros2 launch PKG_NAME LAUNCH_FILE number_of_uavs:=NUMBER

```ros2 launch PKG_NAME LAUNCH_FILE number_of_uavs:=NUMBER

ros2 launch PKG_NAME LAUNCH_FILE number_of_uavs:=NUMBER