hashirzahir's profile - activity

I'm not aware of that. I felt that catkin package had better features than catkin_make for building ROS1 packages. Even

I still dont see your local costmap though. There should be 2 separate costmaps, a large global costmap (black and white

Load a URDF and use the robot_state_publisher to publish the static transforms. Or just use a simple launch file and add

It would be helpful if you added the screenshot with the obstacle in play. Otherwise it is difficult to debug as I am un

What you have provided so far is great. Could you also provide the local and global costmap layers as well as the paths

Could you share your move base configs (local, global costmap and local planner configs) and maybe a screenshot of why y

Hi how did you manage to resolve the DWA planner giving smaller velocity commands than configured in the config file?

Have you tried visualizing the raw magnetometer estimates on rqt graph and compare them with the estimate from the Gyro+

Wow this is really something new. Most IMU ROS drivers I know publish the IMU message at 100-400Hz. Does this mean that

Wow this is really something new. Most IMU ROS drivers I know publish the IMU message at 100-400Hz. Does this mean that

Hi I am assuming by using "just IMU data", you are referring to the accelorometer and gyroscope values. Mind you, these

Just my 2 cents about the realsense D435i camera. It is an engineering marvel for a cheap price of ~$200, and the qualit

Hi, yes I can definitely verify the rotation problem with DWA planner. It was so hard to get it to perform spot turns an

Hi, yes I can definitely verify the rotation problem with DWA planner. It was so hard to get it to perform spot turns an

Hi, I noticed in your cmd_vel subscriber, you have declared a queue size of 1000 messages for the cmd_vel topic. From

Hi do you mind updating how the 150mb/s bandwidth was derived? I could see various 40mb/s topics in your terminal screen

Streaming data from the realsense over wifi is generally a bad idea. It is well known that the realsense pumps an insane

Hi perhaps you want to try SLAM with D435i provided by the intel realsense wiki. This will provide much more accurate od

Perhaps you can use the catkin build command instead of catkin_make. catkin build allows for building individual package

May be you can add some statistics? I have not heard of this behaviour before. Perhaps you can add frequency of control

Does it have to do with the imu0_remove_gravitational_acceleration: true? Perhaps you could also include a snippet of th

Yes gazebo can be run with gui:=false if you only want the gazebo server (physics engine and ros bridge) but not the gaz

Yes what gvdhoorn says is accurate. I am a ROS developer who uses ROS on a frequent basis for robotic applications. Most

Yeah as gvdhoorn mentioned RVIZ is only a data visualization tool. I would have to say that if you were to only run Gaze

Ya the concept is similar for simulated and real life robots. Just define your architecture and the UI should be able to

I would recommend moving to use catkin build instead of catkin_make. catkin build has a lot more functionalities, and as

Please read the documentation on Odometry message. It clearly states what is twist (speed) and pose (position). As long

What is the map frame for in your use case? Traditionally, ROS follows map -> odom -> base_link where odom->bas

First of all, why do you have 2 nodes <node pkg="robot_localization" type="ekf_localization_node" name="ekf_se_odom

Personally having used a Realsense D435i, I have to say there are other considerations as well. We used an intel celeron

Yes in the end it is about your user needs and development time. If you have a longer development time frame, I think bu

The robot_localization node should take in 1 or 2 sensor data such as sensor_msgs::IMU from your IMU and maybe nav_msgs:

Actual navigation of the robot is handled by move_base. You will give position goals to move_base and move_base will pro

Good for you. I generally would avoid ARM based SBCs. I dont think the raspi 4 is that much better (but I personally hav

Yes running only the move base node on the jetson nano should not be a problem. But the nano is not good at handling mul

It would be really helpful if you answered the earlier questions. Please state your use case otherwise it is very hard t

I didn't know it was possible until you had asked. Apparently it is supported according to a forum post here I feel the

This is quite a generic question. Perhaps you could state your use case. For example, it you are in a static environment