ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2013-02-07 01:18:53 -0500 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2012-09-18 02:21:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2012-09-18 02:21:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2012-09-18 02:21:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2012-05-25 08:57:20 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2012-05-24 23:57:07 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2012-05-24 05:47:24 -0500 | commented answer | "rosbag record" vs "rosbag::Bag" Thanks! That's what I am looking for. |
2012-05-24 05:46:55 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2012-05-24 05:21:27 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2012-05-24 04:21:41 -0500 | asked a question | "rosbag record" vs "rosbag::Bag" Hi, When I usually log kinect and other large data, I use "rosbag::Bag" insted of "rosbag record" command. Because a bag made by "rosbag record" has some timestamp delay and gap. On the other hand, a bag made by "rosbag::Bag" is well-timestamped (even where it log kinect data). However, it's a little pain to write all nodes. Does someone have any other good tips? |