ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2021-09-23 23:00:15 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2021-06-16 09:19:57 -0500 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2021-04-28 06:48:46 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2019-06-30 03:44:56 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2019-03-05 10:11:18 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2019-03-01 12:40:25 -0500 | marked best answer | Python Forward Kinematics How can I perform forward kinematics in python? Can I use MoveItCommander to perform forward kinematics? I don't see analogous classes/functions as exist in the C++ kinematics API. Similar questions have suggested using |
2018-12-07 14:06:17 -0500 | marked best answer | Cannot launch UR5 simulation in gazebo I'm attempting to launch a simulation of the UR5 in gazebo with the command and and I had previously messed around with the UR5 in simulation around June, and it worked fine (though the PID gains were a bit off). Has anyone else had this problem? Have you figured out how to fix it? |
2018-11-19 01:09:09 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-04-23 16:46:21 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-03-05 03:46:30 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-02-23 09:50:31 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-02-23 03:47:23 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-02-22 18:19:46 -0500 | commented question | Rviz viewpoint transform Yeah, I was hoping to use it for "viewpoint-aware" teleoperation. Unfortunately I don't think I have the time to figure |
2018-02-22 15:17:12 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-02-22 15:15:59 -0500 | asked a question | Rviz viewpoint transform Rviz viewpoint transform In the views panel on Rviz, I can see the transform of the viewpoint w.r.t. the fixed frame. Is |
2018-02-01 14:13:01 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-01-31 21:17:30 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-01-31 11:47:44 -0500 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2018-01-31 11:46:30 -0500 | answered a question | Get forward kinematics (w/o tf service call) from URDF & joint angles (Kinetic, Python) I asked a similar question a couple of days ago that went unanswered. I've since decided to dig into the source for the |
2018-01-24 13:02:50 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-01-23 18:46:45 -0500 | asked a question | Python Forward Kinematics Python Forward Kinematics How can I perform forward kinematics in python? Can I use MoveItCommander to perform forward |
2018-01-22 14:54:32 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-01-03 17:11:39 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-12-06 01:31:06 -0500 | marked best answer | Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams There are a few dimensions of my robot model that are subject to change at runtime, and so I would like to use the param server to set and get those values. It was easy enough to set the values, but now I am unsure as to the best way to pass them to xacro when uploading the robot description:
Any suggestions welcome. Thanks! |
2017-12-01 16:40:31 -0500 | commented answer | Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams Thanks for the syntax help on calling main(). I'm not very familiar with Python. |
2017-12-01 16:39:47 -0500 | commented answer | Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams I have encountered that issue and will decide whether or not being able to set the xacro arguments from the param server |
2017-12-01 02:31:16 -0500 | answered a question | Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams I ended up solving this problem by running xacro in a subprocess from within python. Here's the launch file: <?xm |
2017-12-01 02:06:49 -0500 | commented answer | Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams Well then I guess we agree that bullet point 1 won't work. As far as bullet 2, I was hoping there was some C++ or Python |
2017-11-30 02:18:08 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-11-29 17:24:46 -0500 | commented answer | Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams I don't think I was clear enough in my post. See my update (though I'm not sure how to get the XML to render properly as |
2017-11-29 17:22:59 -0500 | edited question | Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams There are a few dimensions of my robot model that are subject to change |
2017-11-29 15:32:35 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2017-11-29 15:32:35 -0500 | edited question | Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams There are a few dimensions of my robot model that are subject to change |
2017-11-29 15:08:44 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2017-11-29 15:01:12 -0500 | asked a question | Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams Loading robot_description dependent on rosparams There are a few dimensions of my robot model that are subject to change |
2017-11-17 07:22:42 -0500 | marked best answer | tf: Lookup would require extrapolation into the past I've written the following method for returning the homogeneous transformation matrix between two tf links: When I try to use this method, I get the following error: I tried the solution suggested by Martin Günther on this page, but that just resulted in an infinite while loop. Adding a |
2017-11-12 06:24:26 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-11-10 00:45:41 -0500 | marked best answer | Sharing non-ROS code between packages in catkin I'm currently writing 3 separate packages for 3 different gripper designs. Under the hood, however, they all use the same UDP interface for sending and receiving commands, data, etc. What is the recommended way to share the common code between those packages? Is standard practice just to add a separate, non-package directory in the catkin workspace for building a shared library containing common code? |