move_base alternative
Dear all,
I was wondering if it exists an alternative(s) to the move_base ?
I have searched but I did not find anything.
Thanks,
ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
Dear all,
I was wondering if it exists an alternative(s) to the move_base ?
I have searched but I did not find anything.
Thanks,
Asked: 2019-03-18 03:44:09 -0500
Seen: 1,096 times
Last updated: Mar 18 '19
Not sure whether it qualifies as an "alternative" for you (as it is more of a refactor), but: move_base_flex?
It might help board members suggest alternatives if you could describe what it is that you find lacking in
move_base
and/or prompted you to start looking for alternatives.Thanks a lot for your reply. Yes, I have looked at it already. As you mentioned it can be helpful while searching what is lacking in move_base. But what I am searching now is an easy and simple architecture that could be much more optimized than move_base that I can freely add/remove other functionalities.
Any reason you did not mention this in your post then? You literally wrote:
if you found
move_base_flex
then that cannot be "nothing".What would "optimized" be?
move_base_flex
was specifically created to allow people to "freely add/remove other functionalities" by using Action and topic interfaces for everything, instead of compiling everything into a single node.Could you update your original post with some more information on what you are looking for, what you've tried / already found, why that didn't work for you and what it is that you'd like to see specifically?
Thanks a lot for your reply. It is true that I did not explain very well the reason why I searched an alternative for move_base. I will update the question this evening in order to be more clear.