Revision history [back]

I would think the result you receive from the master makes total sense right now, as you're asking it (ie: the master) to return its pid.

Haven't done this myself in C++, but I would imagine the control flow being similar to Python:

1. retrieve all node names from the master
2. ask all ..

I would think the result you receive from the master makes total sense right now, as you're asking it (ie: the master) to return its pid.

Haven't done this myself in C++, but I would imagine the control flow being similar to Python:

1. retrieve all node names from the master
2. ask all retrieve ..

I would think the result you receive from the master makes total sense right now, as you're asking it (ie: the master) to return its pid.

Haven't done this myself in C++, but I would imagine the control flow being similar to Python:

1. retrieve all node names from the master
2. retrieve ..URIs for all returned names
3. construct clients for all URIs
4. invoke getPid on all clients

I would think the result you receive from the master makes total sense right now, as you're asking it (ie: the master) to return its pid.

Haven't done this myself in C++, but I would imagine the control flow being similar to Python:

1. retrieve all node names from the master
2. retrieve URIs for all returned names
3. construct clients for all URIs
4. invoke getPid on all clients