ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

The principle of the tf_prefix still works, but the implementation is different. AFAIK the currently recommended method is to simple name tf frames "correctly", i.e. robot_a's base_link frame should just be named /robot_a/base_link. The TF library is agnostic to that.

The robot_state_publisher however needs to prefix frames correctly. If it doesn't this won't work easily.