ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | Q&A
Ask Your Question

why does joint state publisher publish joints in a messed order?

asked 2012-10-25 15:52:56 -0600

updated 2012-10-25 17:19:37 -0600

i use the following launch file to start a joint state publisher and robot state publisher for my robot:

<arg name="gui" default="true" />
<param name="robot_description" textfile="$(find My_Robot)/My_Robot.urdf"/>
<param name="use_gui" value="$(arg gui)"/>
<node name="joint_state_publisher" pkg="joint_state_publisher" type="joint_state_publisher" ></node>
<node name="robot_state_publisher" pkg="robot_state_publisher" type="state_publisher" />
<node name="rviz" pkg="rviz" type="rviz" args="-d $(find My_Robot)/urdf.vcg" />

it works well. then i write another node to subscribe to the joint states. once the node receive the joint states, it just print them out with the following code:

for(size_t i=0;i<;i++)
    std::cout<<i<<" , "<<[i]<<std::endl;

but the joint states are in a messed order. that is, my robot is an arm with 7 rotational joints: base_to_link1, link1_to_link2, link2_to_link3, so on and so forth. so i hope the printed message is :

0 , base_to_link1

1 , link1_to_link2

2 , link2_to_link3

but in fact, the printed message is :

0 , link1_to_link2

1 , base_to_link1

2 , link2_to_link3

but in the gui panel, all the joints are in the right order from top to bottom.

does anybody know why? thanks.


it would be convenient if they are in correct order. e.g., i can use the following code to send these joint value to another node through UDP simply:

StringStream ss;
for(size_t i=0;i<joints.position.size();i++) 
   ss << joints.position[i] << ","

of course, i know there are other methods to send them in order. but i think it's better to have them in order.

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted

answered 2012-10-25 16:24:37 -0600

David Lu gravatar image

Short answer: The JointStatePublisher builds the message with a series of python dictionaries, which are not explicitly ordered. Other than convenience, is there a particular reason why you need them in a set order?

edit flag offensive delete link more


thanks man. other than convenient, no other reason :)

yangyangcv gravatar image yangyangcv  ( 2012-10-25 17:21:31 -0600 )edit

It would make it much easier to quickly debug joint states via rostopic echo. And I had to add sorting in the schunk_gui. Not that implying a physical order would give flawless reusability, though..

felix k gravatar image felix k  ( 2012-10-29 02:37:42 -0600 )edit

I've updated the wu_robotics version of joint_state_publisher here to print in order:

David Lu gravatar image David Lu  ( 2012-11-08 08:22:46 -0600 )edit

I'll eventually get around to pushing it to the WG repo.

David Lu gravatar image David Lu  ( 2012-11-08 08:23:09 -0600 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

1 follower


Asked: 2012-10-25 15:52:56 -0600

Seen: 1,709 times

Last updated: Oct 25 '12