ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
1 | initial version |
So this is a bit tongue-in-cheek, but:
Building a stationary robot.
and:
Bring the laser to the right spot using a proximity sensor and a servo
seem to be two conflicting statements :)
In all seriousness: I would say that the fact this is a robot on a stationary base is inconsequential. Anything that can be reasonably modelled as a collection of (largely) independent processes (ie: monitoring, control, etc) could benefit from using ROS (1 or 2).