ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange

Attention: Answers.ros.org is deprecated as of August the 11th, 2023. Please visit robotics.stackexchange.com to ask a new question. This site will remain online in read-only mode during the transition and into the foreseeable future. Selected questions and answers have been migrated, and redirects have been put in place to direct users to the corresponding questions on Robotics Stack Exchange. Additional details are available here.

Revision history [back]

ROS-style aside, options #2 and #3 seem flawed. With #2, you laid out the problem yourself. With #3, you'd either need to add message fields for the timestamp of each datum, or throw out all the timestamps except for the one on the new aggregate message. Even in the former case, some of your data would age while waiting for the aggregate message to fill. Go with #1.

ROS Answers is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.

Powered by Askbot version 0.10.2