ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
1 | initial version |
So I found the cause of the problem. The Size template has no operator <<. I changed the code to access the members width and height.
ROS_INFO_STREAM("Starting to record " << codec << " video at width " << size.width << " height " <<\ size.height << "@" << fps << "fps. Press Ctrl+C to stop recording." );
I am still confused how the Size type gets to use these methods in Size_. Is there some typedef elsewhere? //////////////////////////////// Size_ ////////////////////////////////
/*!
The 2D size class
The class represents the size of a 2D rectangle, image size, matrix size etc.
Normally, cv::Size ~ cv::Size_<int> is used.
*/
template<typename _tp=""> class CV_EXPORTS Size_
{
public:
typedef _Tp value_type;
//! various constructors
Size_();
Size_(_Tp _width, _Tp _height);
Size_(const Size_& sz);
Size_(const CvSize& sz);
Size_(const CvSize2D32f& sz);
Size_(const Point_<_Tp>& pt);
Size_& operator = (const Size_& sz);
//! the area (width*height)
_Tp area() const;
//! conversion of another data type.
template<typename _Tp2> operator Size_<_Tp2>() const;
//! conversion to the old-style OpenCV types
operator CvSize() const;
operator CvSize2D32f() const;
_Tp width, height; // the width and the height
};
I guess I do a patch now and submit to the maintainer?
2 | No.2 Revision |
So I found the cause of the problem. The Size template has no operator <<. I changed the code to access the members width and height.
ROS_INFO_STREAM("Starting to record " << codec << " video at width " << size.width << " height " <<\ size.height << "@" << fps << "fps. Press Ctrl+C to stop recording." );
I am still confused how the Size type gets to use these methods in Size_. Is there some typedef elsewhere? This is in /usr/include/opencv2/core/core.hpp //////////////////////////////// Size_ ////////////////////////////////
/*!
The 2D size class
The class represents the size of a 2D rectangle, image size, matrix size etc.
Normally, cv::Size ~ cv::Size_<int> is used.
*/
template<typename _tp=""> class CV_EXPORTS Size_
{
public:
typedef _Tp value_type;
//! various constructors
Size_();
Size_(_Tp _width, _Tp _height);
Size_(const Size_& sz);
Size_(const CvSize& sz);
Size_(const CvSize2D32f& sz);
Size_(const Point_<_Tp>& pt);
Size_& operator = (const Size_& sz);
//! the area (width*height)
_Tp area() const;
//! conversion of another data type.
template<typename _Tp2> operator Size_<_Tp2>() const;
//! conversion to the old-style OpenCV types
operator CvSize() const;
operator CvSize2D32f() const;
_Tp width, height; // the width and the height
};
I guess I do a patch now and submit to the maintainer?
3 | No.3 Revision |
So I found the cause of the problem. The Size template has no operator <<. I changed the code to access the members width and height.
ROS_INFO_STREAM("Starting to record " << codec << " video at width " << size.width << " height " <<\ size.height << "@" << fps << "fps. Press Ctrl+C to stop recording." );
I am still confused how the Size type gets to use these methods in Size_. Is there some typedef elsewhere?
This is in /usr/include/opencv2/core/core.hpp
/usr/include/opencv2/core/core.hpp
//////////////////////////////// Size_ ////////////////////////////////
/*!
The 2D size class
The class represents the size of a 2D rectangle, image size, matrix size etc.
Normally, cv::Size ~ cv::Size_<int> is used.
*/
template<typename _tp=""> class CV_EXPORTS Size_
{
public:
typedef _Tp value_type;
//! various constructors
Size_();
Size_(_Tp _width, _Tp _height);
Size_(const Size_& sz);
Size_(const CvSize& sz);
Size_(const CvSize2D32f& sz);
Size_(const Point_<_Tp>& pt);
Size_& operator = (const Size_& sz);
//! the area (width*height)
_Tp area() const;
//! conversion of another data type.
template<typename _Tp2> operator Size_<_Tp2>() const;
//! conversion to the old-style OpenCV types
operator CvSize() const;
operator CvSize2D32f() const;
_Tp width, height; // the width and the height
};
I guess I do a patch now and submit to the maintainer?