ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
1 | initial version |
Hi!
Yes, you are correct. That parameter is currently a misnomer and I need to correct it (where "correct" means actually carry out differential integration, rather than the static offset treatment I'm currently giving it). I'll update that ASAP and get it into my devel branches until a release can be pushed through.
It is my sincere hope that you're not losing anything by letting robot_localization carry out the integration, but if you'd prefer to have control over that, then the fix for (1) should facilitate that.
2 | No.2 Revision |
Hi!
Yes, you are correct. That parameter is currently a misnomer and I need to correct it (where "correct" means actually carry out differential integration, rather than the static offset treatment I'm currently giving it). I'll update that ASAP and get it into my devel branches until a release can be pushed through.
It is my sincere hope that you're not losing anything by letting robot_localization carry out the integration, but if you'd prefer to have control over that, then the fix for (1) should facilitate that.