ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
1 | initial version |
Thanks for your help :)
You wrote:
(a) add URDF support for parallel robots and give us a patch we can then integrate. This is going to be a little complicated though.
We think this is the best way. Could you elaborate on the complications? We don't know for sure if we choose this path, because option b) or our own option c) (creating a new package) seem plausible as well.
Thanks
2 | No.2 Revision |
Thanks for your help :)
You wrote:
(a) add URDF support for parallel robots and give us a patch we can then integrate. This is going to be a little complicated though.
We think this is the best way. Could you elaborate on the complications?
We don't know for sure if we choose this path, because option b) or our own option c) (creating a new package) seem plausible as well.well. We probably first try option b, because it seems easier than creating a new package or adding support for a parallel robot ROS wide. I come back when i have any more questions :-) Thanks!
Thanks
3 | No.3 Revision |
Thanks for your help :)
You wrote:
(a) add URDF support for parallel robots and give us a patch we can then integrate. This is going to be a little complicated though.
We think this is the best way. Could you elaborate on the complications?
We don't know for sure if we choose this path, because option b) or our own option c) (creating a new package) seem plausible as well.
// edit
We probably first try option b, because it seems easier than creating a new package or adding support for a parallel robot ROS wide. I come back when i have any more questions :-) Thanks!
Thanks