ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2023-01-19 19:36:57 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2022-12-14 05:18:58 -0500 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2022-11-16 06:23:58 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-11-16 04:19:15 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2022-07-11 12:04:27 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2022-06-21 08:27:57 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2022-06-19 23:31:23 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-06-19 23:31:23 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-06-19 22:13:19 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-06-19 22:13:19 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-03-11 12:05:55 -0500 | answered a question | Controller server parameters for an omnidirectional robot I changed "shorten_transformed_plan" to false and the velocity increased taking into account max_vel parameters. Also, t |
2022-03-11 12:05:55 -0500 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2022-03-10 13:14:18 -0500 | edited question | Controller server parameters for an omnidirectional robot Controller server parameters for an omnidirectional robot Hello, I have a mecanum robot that's using Nav2. Right now, I |
2022-03-10 13:12:54 -0500 | asked a question | Controller server parameters for an omnidirectional robot Controller server parameters for an omnidirectional robot Hello, I have a mecanum robot that's using Nav2. Right now, I |
2022-03-04 08:34:26 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2022-02-02 07:53:58 -0500 | edited question | ira_laser_tools not consistently merging laserscans Problems with ira_laser_tools Hello, I'm currently attempting to merge to LIDAR scans. These are the same LIDAR model, |
2022-02-02 07:53:05 -0500 | asked a question | ira_laser_tools not consistently merging laserscans Problems with ira_laser_tools Hello, I'm currently attempting to merge to LIDAR scans. These are the same LIDAR model, |
2022-01-26 06:55:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-01-08 07:41:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-01-07 07:46:34 -0500 | commented question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' I'll definitely rebuild a new workspace with the same src file and check for differences in CPU usage. My background is |
2022-01-07 05:31:17 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-01-07 05:30:34 -0500 | commented question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' I simply followed the tutorial ([https://docs.ros.org/en/galactic/Installation/Ubuntu-Development-Setup.html]) to build |
2022-01-07 05:30:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Commentator |
2022-01-06 13:55:07 -0500 | commented question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' I'll further attempt to reduce unnecessary CPU usage, since I plan to use a LIDAR like Velodyne's which might require ev |
2022-01-06 13:50:00 -0500 | commented question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' Alright, I've reduced the FPS in the realsense wrapper configuration file to 15 (from 30) and this reduced the CPU usage |
2022-01-06 13:49:47 -0500 | commented question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' Alright, I've reduced the FPS in the realsense wrapper configuration file to 15 (from 30) and this reduced the CPU usage |
2022-01-06 13:49:15 -0500 | commented question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' Alright, I've reduced the FPS in the realsense wrapper configuration file to 15 (from 30) and this reduced the CPU usage |
2022-01-06 13:48:53 -0500 | commented question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' Alright, I've reduced the FPS in the realsense wrapper configuration file to 15 (from 30) and this reduced the CPU usage |
2022-01-06 13:48:36 -0500 | commented question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' Alright, I've reduced the FPS in the realsense wrapper configuration file to 15 (from 30) and this reduced the CPU usage |
2022-01-06 13:48:05 -0500 | commented question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' Alright, I've reduced the FPS in the realsense wrapper configuration file to 15 (from 30) and this reduced the CPU usage |
2022-01-06 10:24:39 -0500 | commented question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' The laser_scan_matcher is taking up 95-100%; realsense2 around 40-50%; Xorg around 35%; lxterminal is 20%; depthimage_to |
2022-01-06 07:42:10 -0500 | commented question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' Hi, I'm using the one with 20W and 6 cores. Which for some reason isn't listed on that link for the Xavier NX. This one |
2022-01-05 17:50:03 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2022-01-05 12:44:36 -0500 | edited question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' Hello, (I'll sta |
2022-01-05 12:44:36 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2022-01-05 10:43:06 -0500 | asked a question | Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' Slam Toolbox: Message Filter dropping message for reason 'discarding message because the queue is full' Hello, I'm curr |
2021-08-13 09:13:23 -0500 | commented answer | How to Publish Odometry to use with Hector SLAM @zlg9 The question wasn't regarding obtaining odometry from Hector SLAM, but to add an odometry source to Hector SLAM. A |
2021-08-10 05:40:48 -0500 | commented question | Is there any reason changing the reference frame would change a scan's frame? I have noticed that if I select the /odom as fixed frame, it seems like the scan's position is delayed (the points in th |
2021-08-05 07:39:15 -0500 | edited question | Is there any reason changing the reference frame would change a scan's frame? Is there any reason changing the reference frame would change a scan's frame? Hello, I currently have a system containin |
2021-08-05 07:12:23 -0500 | commented question | Is there any reason changing the reference frame would change a scan's frame? Odd in what way? Its claimed max range is 9m, and I have tested it and confirm. I'm not familiar with the algorithm the |
2021-08-05 06:32:44 -0500 | commented question | Is there any reason changing the reference frame would change a scan's frame? Odd in what way? Its claimed max range is 9m, and I have tested it and confirm. I'm not familiar with the algorithm the |
2021-08-05 06:32:24 -0500 | commented question | Is there any reason changing the reference frame would change a scan's frame? Odd in what way? It's claimed max range is 9m, and I have tested it and confirm. I'm not familiar with the algorithm the |
2021-08-04 08:16:51 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-08-04 06:05:45 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2021-08-03 04:43:58 -0500 | commented question | Is there any reason changing the reference frame would change a scan's frame? The Intel L515 has an IMU, a camera and a lidar (70x43 FOV). It outputs and dense pointcloud 640x480p and the scan (whit |
2021-08-03 04:36:36 -0500 | commented question | Choosing odom frame misaligns scans from diferent sources? The question I sent before as I reread it seemed confusing, and with redundant information, so I decided to rewrite it m |
2021-08-02 15:26:05 -0500 | asked a question | Choosing odom frame misaligns scans from diferent sources? Choosing odom frame misaligns scans from diferent sources? Hello, I currently have a system containing a velodyne VLP 16 |
2021-08-02 08:15:16 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-08-01 02:24:06 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2021-07-30 15:48:37 -0500 | asked a question | Is there any reason changing the reference frame would change a scan's frame? Is there any reason changing the reference frame would change a scan's frame? Hello, I currently have a system containin |