ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2023-03-30 08:08:26 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-03-30 08:08:26 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-07-12 06:26:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2022-05-10 09:27:45 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-12-01 14:53:36 -0500 | commented answer | Unsupported interface type {interface_file.suffix} The first person to encounter this here was on Nov 5th. Everyone who experienced this found it using Rolling. We all d |
2021-11-10 10:08:34 -0500 | commented answer | Unsupported interface type {interface_file.suffix} I am using the Rolling binaries in this case. The people on my team who are working on MoveIt are using Rolling from a |
2021-11-09 08:51:55 -0500 | marked best answer | Unsupported interface type {interface_file.suffix} A bunch of us hit this after doing an apt upgrade these last couple days: I found that by purging I recognize that these are deprecated packages and that they were probably on my system for a long time and not updated recently. This did seem to affect almost everyone in our office starting on Friday (Nov 5th). Jochen found that this specific issue is fixed here: https://github.com/ros2/rosidl/pull/612 And that because that is not yet published you can hack around it with this: The long term solution is that ROS 2 itself should probably use python3 directly instead of any dependence on the state of the symbolic link /usr/bin/python. In the comments below it was pointed out that this is only possible if you upgraded to 20.04. If you upgraded to 20.04 it might be worth purging everything ros/python from your system to avoid issues like this. This issue is probably not as widespread as I thought it was because the number of people who upgraded from 18.04 is probably much higher on our team here than in the general population of ros. I'm sorry for making such an issue out of this. Thank you to those who looked into this. |
2021-11-09 08:47:12 -0500 | answered a question | Unsupported interface type {interface_file.suffix} In the comments below it was pointed out that this is only possible if you upgraded to 20.04. If you upgraded to 20.04 i |
2021-11-09 08:47:12 -0500 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2021-11-09 08:47:11 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2021-11-09 01:45:15 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-11-08 18:26:25 -0500 | edited question | Unsupported interface type {interface_file.suffix} Unsupported interface type {interface_file.suffix} A bunch of us hit this after doing an apt upgrade these last couple d |
2021-11-08 16:03:02 -0500 | commented question | Unsupported interface type {interface_file.suffix} This machine was upgraded from 18.04. I would not be surprised if the other machines that people reported this issue fr |
2021-11-08 16:01:16 -0500 | edited question | Unsupported interface type {interface_file.suffix} python-is-python2 A bunch of us hit this after doing an apt upgrade these last couple days: Traceback (most recent call |
2021-11-08 15:21:17 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2021-11-08 15:03:19 -0500 | commented question | Unsupported interface type {interface_file.suffix} I'm here because I thought this belonged on github and I posted it there. But then a bunch of people on my team hit thi |
2021-11-08 12:02:41 -0500 | edited question | Unsupported interface type {interface_file.suffix} python-is-python2 A bunch of us hit this after doing an apt upgrade these last couple days: Traceback (most recent call |
2021-11-08 12:02:02 -0500 | asked a question | Unsupported interface type {interface_file.suffix} python-is-python2 A bunch of us hit this after doing an apt upgrade these last couple days: Traceback (most recent call |
2021-11-08 12:01:08 -0500 | asked a question | python-is-python2 python-is-python2 A bunch of us hit this after doing an apt upgrade these last couple days: ``` Traceback (most recen |
2021-11-02 03:17:55 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-11-02 03:17:55 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2021-09-17 03:35:27 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-07-23 09:39:26 -0500 | marked best answer | node_interface for now? The node_interfaces (https://github.com/ros2/rclcpp/tree/m...) are really useful for dependency injection allowing much nicer tests. There however does not seem to be an interface that provides the method |
2021-07-20 10:13:03 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2021-07-19 12:47:31 -0500 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2021-07-19 12:46:53 -0500 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2021-07-19 12:46:53 -0500 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2021-07-19 12:41:16 -0500 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2021-07-19 12:41:16 -0500 | answered a question | Create subscription from NodeTopicsInterface? After being shown an example of how to use rclcpp::create_subscription (the header I linked to) I realized it has nearly |
2021-07-19 12:23:13 -0500 | asked a question | Create subscription from NodeTopicsInterface? Create subscription from NodeTopicsInterface? How do I go about creating a subscription from the NodeTopicsInterface? T |
2021-07-19 12:17:28 -0500 | answered a question | node_interface for now? I found that you can get a NodeClockInterface and gen call now like this: node_clock_interface->get_clock()->now() |
2021-07-19 12:17:28 -0500 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2021-07-19 10:21:26 -0500 | asked a question | node_interface for now? node_interface for now? The node_interfaces (https://github.com/ros2/rclcpp/tree/master/rclcpp/include/rclcpp/node_inter |
2021-07-19 10:18:26 -0500 | marked best answer | How is the name field of ParameterDescriptor used by declare_parameter? The first parameter you pass into every version of |
2021-07-19 10:18:26 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2021-07-19 10:18:25 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2021-05-24 01:18:43 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-05-23 16:19:52 -0500 | received badge | ● Favorite Question (source) |
2021-05-21 05:32:04 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2021-05-16 17:18:58 -0500 | asked a question | How is the name field of ParameterDescriptor used by declare_parameter? How is the name field of ParameterDescriptor used by declare_parameter? The first parameter you pass into every version |
2021-03-17 00:38:28 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2021-03-17 00:38:05 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-01-08 09:22:19 -0500 | commented answer | Is there an ament version of catkin_topological_order? As it stands there is no way to have colcon execute a test that wasn't declared in the package.xml or cmake file. This |
2021-01-04 17:36:01 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |