ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question

theseankelly's profile - activity

2021-05-28 08:55:00 -0500 received badge  Notable Question (source)
2020-11-05 10:49:15 -0500 received badge  Famous Question (source)
2020-11-05 10:49:15 -0500 received badge  Notable Question (source)
2020-07-08 13:35:28 -0500 received badge  Student (source)
2020-06-01 16:52:02 -0500 received badge  Popular Question (source)
2020-05-01 13:03:34 -0500 received badge  Popular Question (source)
2020-04-30 16:13:35 -0500 commented question [ROS2] UnicodeEncodeError building test_msgs as an overlay on Windows

It seems like rebuilding the rosidl package as well avoids this, but I don't think that should be necessary to generate

2020-04-30 16:12:43 -0500 commented question [ROS2] Unicode problems when building interface packages as an overlay on Windows

sorry for the double post; mistake obviously.

2020-04-30 05:25:50 -0500 asked a question [ROS2] Unicode problems when building interface packages as an overlay on Windows

[ROS2] Unicode problems when building interface packages as an overlay on Windows Hey Forum, I'm working on the ros2_do

2020-04-30 05:24:34 -0500 asked a question [ROS2] UnicodeEncodeError building test_msgs as an overlay on Windows

[ROS2] UnicodeEncodeError building test_msgs as an overlay on Windows Hey Forum, I'm working on the ros2_dotnet project

2020-03-05 12:53:19 -0500 commented answer Disable hardware specific tests on bloom

Thanks @gvdhoorn and @nuclearsandwich.

2020-03-05 12:52:05 -0500 marked best answer Disable hardware specific tests on bloom

Hey Forum

I'm working on submitting a sensor driver package to bloom for the first time. My package (https://github.com/ifm/ifm3d-ros) has unit tests which require the presence of my sensor hardware to execute. The tests are currently optional under the CATKIN_ENABLE_TESTING flag.

My suspicion is that bloom will automatically run these tests (and thus fail due to no hardware), correct? If so, I suppose I need to either:

  1. Wrap the testing clause inside another opt-in custom CMAKE flag which won't be set inside of the bloom system
  2. Identify some other bloom mechanism to explicitly opt-out of testing for my package

Is one or the other option preferred?

Thanks!

2020-03-05 12:52:05 -0500 received badge  Scholar (source)
2020-03-05 07:28:33 -0500 commented answer Disable hardware specific tests on bloom

That was my original understanding, but then I ran a bloom Prerelease Test for the core driver package (ifm3d_core) on w

2020-03-05 06:59:43 -0500 asked a question Disable hardware specific tests on bloom

Disable hardware specific tests on bloom Hey Forum I'm working on submitting a sensor driver package to bloom for the f

2020-01-03 05:27:53 -0500 answered a question What depth sensors are best supported by ROS 2?

Disclaimer: I work for ifm The ifm O3D303 and O3X industrial ToF cameras are supported in ROS2 dashing. I'm the maintai

2020-01-03 05:27:53 -0500 received badge  Rapid Responder (source)
2019-09-27 13:12:35 -0500 commented question State of ROS2 on embedded MCUs

Thanks! I haven't done much with it (I pivoted to another ROS2 topic at the moment but I'll be coming back to this idea

2019-09-27 13:11:58 -0500 commented answer State of ROS2 on embedded MCUs

Thanks for the info -- I don't have a big issue with bridging. I'm coming at this more from intellectual curiosity to se

2019-08-14 07:49:30 -0500 received badge  Famous Question (source)
2019-08-08 02:53:10 -0500 received badge  Notable Question (source)
2019-07-17 06:26:19 -0500 received badge  Enthusiast
2019-06-24 16:32:46 -0500 received badge  Popular Question (source)
2019-06-23 07:38:05 -0500 asked a question State of ROS2 on embedded MCUs

State of ROS2 on embedded MCUs Hey All, I've recently been diving in to the state of ROS2 on embedded microcontrollers

2019-06-23 06:37:54 -0500 received badge  Autobiographer