ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2019-06-12 12:37:38 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2019-03-27 12:41:09 -0500 | received badge | ● Taxonomist |
2019-02-21 02:05:35 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-02-20 02:03:35 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2019-02-18 02:58:58 -0500 | commented answer | Installing ROS on fedora 29 Thanks for your answer. Due to the difficulties, I decided to move towards a Docker installation based on the ROS image, |
2019-02-13 12:59:06 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2019-02-13 12:19:08 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2019-02-13 12:19:08 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-02-04 02:01:43 -0500 | marked best answer | rosjava kinetic discussing with roscpp melodic Hi, During a test phase that we are currently putting in place, we have created a project that has ros running in a ROS-Docker (Melodic), in which we created some nodes using roscpp. We have been able to interact with those nodes with rosbridge javascript and also jrosbridge on a web page. We are willing to test more java in our project. Does it make any sens to create rosjava nodes (supported only for Kinetic) interacting with our ros in the docker based on Melodic? What would we lose with rosjava? I don't want to have ros in the docker based on kinetic, since we want to keep up with the latest developments. will rosjava follow up the development and pass to ROS2 when stable? |
2019-02-04 02:01:43 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2019-02-04 02:01:25 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-02-04 02:01:02 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-02-04 02:01:02 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-01-31 03:27:34 -0500 | asked a question | rosjava kinetic discussing with roscpp melodic rosjava kinetic discussing with roscpp melodic Hi, During a test phase that we are currently putting in place, we have |
2018-12-20 10:00:55 -0500 | answered a question | Installation from sources: Fail to Built Image_View (Fedora 29) I restarted from scratch and it finally found the sources files of gtk. (might have been a cache issue...?) |
2018-12-20 02:07:26 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-12-19 07:06:35 -0500 | commented question | Installation from sources: Fail to Built Image_View (Fedora 29) Yes they are installed (for the gtk-3.0: /usr/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtk.h) |
2018-12-19 07:06:18 -0500 | commented question | Installation from sources: Fail to Built Image_View (Fedora 29) Yes they are installed (fro the gtk-3.0: /usr/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtk.h) |
2018-12-19 05:36:30 -0500 | asked a question | Installation from sources: Fail to Built Image_View (Fedora 29) Installation from sources: Fail to Built Image_View (Fedora 29) Hi, I am currently trying to build ros from sources on |
2018-12-19 05:23:02 -0500 | edited question | Installing ROS on fedora 29 installation fedora 29 Hi, I am trying to install ros (full installation) on Fedora 29 from source following this link. |
2018-12-19 05:23:02 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2018-12-19 05:22:31 -0500 | edited question | Installing ROS on fedora 29 installation fedora 29 Hi, I am trying to install ros (full installation) on Fedora 29 from source following this link. |
2018-12-18 06:15:10 -0500 | asked a question | Installing ROS on fedora 29 installation fedora 29 Hi, I am trying to install ros (full installation) on Fedora 29 from source following this link. |