ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2022-07-11 08:52:58 -0500 | asked a question | MoveGroup::plan causes hang/crash after apt update on ARM64 MoveGroup::plan causes hang/crash after apt update on ARM64 On an ARM64 docker image based on ros:noetic, calling a Move |
2022-07-11 08:51:33 -0500 | asked a question | LazyPRM with load_planner_data or _store_planner_data causes an undebuggable crash (after apt update, on ARM) LazyPRM with load_planner_data or _store_planner_data causes an undebuggable crash (after apt update, on ARM) On an ARM6 |
2019-04-22 16:04:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2019-02-28 09:52:04 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2019-01-02 17:31:18 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-04-02 18:16:13 -0500 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2018-01-29 11:23:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-01-09 20:16:17 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-12-29 15:02:10 -0500 | commented answer | MoveIt! path final position is off significantly It's possible, but the commit literally just had that one change in it, and it solved the problem. It was a pretty long |
2017-12-27 19:08:56 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-11-15 08:39:38 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2017-11-10 01:12:41 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-11-10 01:03:56 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-11-09 15:55:28 -0500 | marked best answer | MoveIt! path final position is off significantly Hi everyone. I'm trying to use MoveIt! for path planning. I'm using the TRAC_IK and I set the timeout to 10 seconds (just as a debugging measure), but the final position is consistently off by an inconsistent amount. This is frustrating in particular because I was led to understand the path planners would be pretty much perfect given enough time. I'm running the planner pretty much as the tutorial suggests I do it: and I'm getting back a result as a I suspect my issue is the inverse kinematics in particular because I've also tried KDL and that seemed to make the problem worse, but it could also be the planner (I've thus far been unable to change the planner. All instructions have failed me. I'll comment with steps I've attempted, but this is not part of my question unless someone thinks it's relevant). It could also be something entirely different. I would appreciate any debugging steps or notes on how to resolve this issue. Thank you! |
2017-11-09 15:55:23 -0500 | answered a question | MoveIt! path final position is off significantly The issue was that i wasn't setting TRAC IK's solve_type, so it was defaulting to Speed. To be totally blunt, I'm not su |
2017-11-09 15:16:02 -0500 | marked best answer | RRTConnect/TRAC IK fails only on Distance solve_type So I'm trying to change the The error is as follows: The code I'm using to solve is as follows: Again, it works with "Speed" but not with "Distance". My I wouldn't mind changing to a different planner (if I could figure out how), but I think TRAC IK is right for our application. Is there a way I can fix it? Am I not including the right information in the request? |
2017-11-09 15:16:02 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2017-11-09 15:15:57 -0500 | answered a question | RRTConnect/TRAC IK fails only on Distance solve_type My problem was actually that my timeout was too high. I suppose MoveIt! or OMPL somewhere down the line has its own time |
2017-11-09 11:15:39 -0500 | edited question | RRTConnect/TRAC IK fails only on Distance solve_type RRTConnect/TRAC IK fails only on Distance solve_type So I'm trying to change the solve_type to "Distance" as opposed to |
2017-11-09 11:15:06 -0500 | asked a question | RRTConnect/TRAC IK fails only on Distance solve_type RRTConnect/TRAC IK fails only on Distance solve_type So I'm trying to change the solve_type to "Distance" as opposed to |
2017-11-09 11:02:24 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2017-11-03 08:08:40 -0500 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2017-11-02 14:47:09 -0500 | answered a question | MoveIt RobotState initialisation The "robot_description" param is just the description of the robot universally (it's loaded from the URDF). The robot mo |
2017-11-02 14:47:09 -0500 | commented question | MoveIt! path final position is off significantly I'm also somewhat unclear on the terminology. By "Planner" I mean RRTConnect or similar, not OMPL. |
2017-11-02 14:47:08 -0500 | commented question | MoveIt! path final position is off significantly I've attempted the following to change the planner: 1) Setting a different value for the request's planner_id 2) Removin |
2017-11-02 14:47:08 -0500 | asked a question | MoveIt! path final position is off significantly MoveIt! path final position is off significantly Hi everyone. I'm trying to use MoveIt! for path planning. I'm using th |