ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2021-08-10 10:34:52 -0500 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2021-02-27 00:29:54 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2019-09-18 15:15:48 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2019-05-20 02:12:33 -0500 | marked best answer | dynamixel_motor support for protocol 2.0 Has anyone transitioned from protocol 1.0 to 2.0 following recent firmware upgrades? I'm currently using MX-64T's with the dynamixel_motor stack, but I'm trying to understand what upgrading to protocol 2.0 would entail. Is this as simple as updating the control table addresses in dynamixel_const.py? Or would it be best to incorporate the official Robotis DynamixelSDK package in place of the dynamixel_driver package? Any advice is appreciated! |
2018-10-11 08:28:28 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-09-14 18:09:50 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-02-23 06:25:03 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-02-02 09:44:27 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-01-24 19:20:29 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-12-01 22:58:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-11-30 10:42:44 -0500 | marked best answer | Failed to create the global_planner/GlobalPlanner planner Setup: ROS Kinetic, Ubuntu 16.04 on the TurtleBot platform, when launching the move_base node configured for the global_planner/GlobalPlanner, I receive the following error:
I load
where the I've re-installed the nav stack and re-built my workspace to no avail. |
2017-11-30 10:32:45 -0500 | commented question | Failed to create the global_planner/GlobalPlanner planner very sorry, the problem seems to have been caused by sourcing conflicting workspace. this is resolved. thanks! |
2017-11-29 22:54:19 -0500 | asked a question | Failed to create the global_planner/GlobalPlanner planner Failed to create the global_planner/GlobalPlanner planner Setup: ROS Kinetic, Ubuntu 16.04 on the TurtleBot platform, w |
2017-10-26 23:32:17 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2017-10-11 20:47:24 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-10-06 16:19:11 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-10-05 03:59:44 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-08-18 17:48:57 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-08-08 11:10:21 -0500 | marked best answer | tf2 reversing coordinate frame tree The tf2 documentation suggests that the implementation somewhat breaks down in cases where coordinate frames require re-parenting. Is there a reasonable solution for completely reversing the child-parent tree? A simple example: a serial manipulator has 3 joints, 'joint1', 'joint2', 'joint3', and the tf2 tree is configured to reflect this (joint1 --> joint2 --> joint3). At any point, I'd like to reverse the configuration such that the 'joint3' frame is now effectively treated as the 'joint1' frame (i.e. joint3 --> joint2 --> joint1). A thought: Would a potential solution be to modify the frame_id for each joint? For instance, before reversing, the frame_ids 'joint1', 'joint2', and 'joint3' would correspond to the physical joint1, joint2, and joint3, respectively. Then, could I simply overwrite the frame_ids linked to the physical joints such that the physical joint1 is represented by frame_id 'joint3', etc. ? |
2017-08-08 11:09:43 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2017-08-08 11:08:56 -0500 | asked a question | Semi-constrained end-effector goal orientation Semi-constrained end-effector goal orientation I'm using MoveIt! with TRAC-IK to do motion planning for a 6-DOF robotic |
2017-08-06 07:22:11 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2017-08-05 14:23:22 -0500 | asked a question | dynamixel_motor support for protocol 2.0 dynamixel_motor support for protocol 2.0 Has anyone transitioned from protocol 1.0 to 2.0 following recent firmware upgr |
2017-07-28 08:33:50 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-07-28 08:33:50 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-06-26 14:07:32 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2017-06-23 19:02:30 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-06-23 16:09:40 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2017-06-23 16:09:14 -0500 | marked best answer | Guide for managing a ros project with Git I've been searching around through the documentation/forum posts and haven't really found a good walk-through explaining how to set up version control of a ros project using Git. I'll explain what I have and what I'm hoping to do (it's very possible that what I have in mind is not necessarily the most efficient way of maintaining our source code, so feel free to point me towards something more in-line with current convention or best practices). I am fairly inexperienced with ROS and Git. Just for a very simple example, I have a catkin workspace
I'd like to have version control for Thanks for any guidance or advice! We want to be sure we're starting off with good organization, as I'd imagine it can be painful to try to reorganize later on ... |
2017-06-23 16:09:14 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2017-06-23 11:41:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-06-23 11:14:29 -0500 | commented answer | Guide for managing a ros project with Git thanks for the example ... so in this instance, is https://github.com/googlecartographer/cartographer.git or https://git |
2017-06-23 10:19:54 -0500 | asked a question | Guide for managing a ros project with Git Guide for managing a ros project with Git I've been searching around through the documentation/forum posts and haven't r |
2017-06-20 08:46:50 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-06-13 11:56:50 -0500 | edited question | ros kinetic install fails to resolve dependencies (qtbase5-dev) ros kinetic install fails to resolve dependencies (qtbase5-dev) We are operating on a Raspberry Pi 3 Model B, with Debia |
2017-06-13 10:28:42 -0500 | asked a question | ros kinetic install fails to resolve dependencies (qtbase5-dev) ros kinetic install fails to resolve dependencies (qtbase5-dev) We are operating on a Raspberry Pi 3 Model B, with Debia |