ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2014-10-14 14:35:03 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2013-07-11 08:29:38 -0500 | received badge | ● Great Answer (source) |
2013-03-19 00:23:39 -0500 | received badge | ● Good Answer (source) |
2013-01-29 11:01:59 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2013-01-26 02:43:27 -0500 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
2012-12-28 02:57:53 -0500 | answered a question | rosdep update error I had the same problem today which I manged to resolve and I think this is the best place to give the reasons and solution. Firstly, when we try: We get the following message, as OP mentions: The solution mentioned in this error message is incomplete (or let's say ambiguous). To me it seems like, "remove pip" and install the python-rosdep. Doing this leads to the following (this is what OP got): As can be seen, rosdep version is 0.9.5, whereas the apt-cache policy is for rosdep version 0.10.7-1. That is, although we installed the latest version using apt-get, the detected version is still the old one. What is the cause? The cause is, previous rosdep could only be installed/uninstalled using pip. So, we will have to uninstall the older rosdep using pip (which means, when the original solution said "uninstall the pip version", what was really meant was "uninstall older rosdep using pip"). This is how it would look: Now we can remove "pip" if we like, and we reinstall the newer version of rosdep: Next, follow the regular steps: All the versions match now:). Remove the old sources file and perform rosdep init and update : And there it is, rosdep is ready for use. I hope this is useful. |
2012-10-01 06:44:42 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2012-10-01 06:44:42 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2012-10-01 06:44:42 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2012-09-20 22:38:19 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2012-09-20 22:38:19 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2012-09-20 22:38:19 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2012-07-17 06:17:52 -0500 | commented answer | Is roboearth going through an intense week of migrating to fuerte? Oh! Does that mean, the fuerte version will have to wait? In any case, I will wait for your response if you make RE work for electric. Good luck |
2012-06-27 04:28:07 -0500 | answered a question | Is roboearth going through an intense week of migrating to fuerte? Ok, thanks :) I will wait for the next revision. |
2012-06-27 01:14:53 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2012-06-25 06:48:03 -0500 | answered a question | Creating Object models for 3D Object Recognition I wonder if you faced the same problem as I. I have been trying to make latest source of roboearth work with fuerte. It compiles, it records, but it cannot save the model. I have noticed that in the past week they have been changing parts of their code (quite frequently). I, in fact, asked them this - http://answers.ros.org/question/37152/is-roboearth-going-through-an-intense-week-of/ - but haven't gotten a response yet. I believe, soon they will have a version ready, if we can be patient. To answer your question, I think you could also give the object_recognition stack a try (but I don't have any experience to give an educated point of view). Also check the following out: http://ecto.willowgarage.com/recognition/links/object_recognition_capture/index.html |
2012-06-25 02:47:32 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2012-06-24 13:19:36 -0500 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2012-06-24 12:39:28 -0500 | answered a question | Creating Object models for 3D Object Recognition Hi, You should give a try to roboearth: http://www.ros.org/wiki/roboearth One of the tutorials (and there are only two) is exactly about recording and creating models. It is straightforward. In addition, roboearth uses pcl extensively in creating models. While you explore this, also think about adding new models to roboearth database (which is also explained in the same tutorial). Hopefully this helps. |
2012-06-24 12:33:28 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2012-06-24 12:18:18 -0500 | asked a question | Is roboearth going through an intense week of migrating to fuerte? Hi, I have noticed that in past 7/8 days, roboearth source has changed very vigorously. I have been able to install roboearth on ubuntu 12.04 with fuerte. However, when running re_object_recorder gui, when I try to save the model, i get the following error: OpenCV is NOT compiled with SURF support. This problem, I am assuming comes from the fact that SURF and SIFT are now patented and are available with OpenCV as 3rd-party nonfree libraries. Could this be the reason why I was not able to save models? Has this problem been/being resolved at the moment? I will appreciate any help. Thanks in advance |
2012-06-21 13:30:04 -0500 | asked a question | Is it possible to use latest roboearth with electric? Hi, I have ros-electric and pcl-1.1 installed. Now I wanted to explore roboearth and have been failing to get it installed. While compiling roboearth, when compilation process reaches to the package ar_bounding_box, it fails. I apologize, in advance, because I don't have the full details of the message at hand, but I think I can explain the problem (hopefully mush in my head wont fail me). Problem here is that in the organization of package pcl-1.1 the "transforms.h" does not exist in "pcl/include/tranforms.h". Later I installed perception_pcl_unstable (which contains pcl-1.4) for electric and even for that "transforms.h" does not exist in "pcl/include/tranforms.h". Fianlly I thought of looking through fuerte and there it was "pcl/include/tranforms.h" , right where it was expected by roboearth. So, it seems that roboearth is migrating (or has it already migrated?) to fuerte. But if we look at the installation options on roboearth roswiki - http://www.ros.org/wiki/roboearth - the installation instructions are still for electric. So, couple of questions: 1. Has roboearth migrated or is in process of migrating to fuerte? 2. Is is still possible to use roboearth with electric? (I am defeated in trying ... today :) ) Thanks in advance |