ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2017-07-27 10:24:18 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2017-07-20 02:40:56 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-02-03 08:57:29 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-10-14 09:04:48 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-10-09 07:30:11 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2015-10-09 07:30:11 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2015-10-09 07:30:11 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-10-06 02:19:05 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2015-06-03 02:59:42 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-05-13 09:22:35 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2015-05-13 05:41:47 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2015-05-11 08:23:16 -0500 | asked a question | meter_scoring: move_ base navigation Hi all, I'm using move_base for 2D navigation and it's working.the only thing is that i keep getting the a warn about having meter_scoring not set. the warn is the following: And in my base_local_planner_params i set it to true. I'm having good and bad results from time to time, could this be the problem? what can i do to stop having this warn?? Thank you for your time, Salvador |
2015-05-09 02:56:06 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2015-05-08 07:19:25 -0500 | commented question | Navigation stack goal off global costmap @Humpelstilzchen thank you for taking time to look at my question. It's resolved, I was publishing into the odom_combined frame and it has to be into the base_footprint frame. |
2015-05-08 03:26:40 -0500 | commented question | Navigation stack goal off global costmap I'm new at this so i don't know if a did it. i set all the parameters for the .yaml with http://wiki.ros.org/move_base#Parameters http://wiki.ros.org/costmap_2d#costma... http://wiki.ros.org/base_local_planne... |
2015-05-08 03:20:32 -0500 | commented answer | Robot_pose_ekf bad frecuency Yes i know that, the thing i need to know is ow to make my robot_pose_ekf to go faster |
2015-05-07 11:05:48 -0500 | asked a question | Navigation stack goal off global costmap Hi all I'm using the navigation stack in my robot and every time i send a goal using rviz (2D Nav Goal) it throws me the following:
my global costmap is the following: and the same for the local costmap, only changing the width, height and resolution (20,20, 0.05 respectively) The goal I'm sending is just one meter from the base on x-axis so the action should be just to move straight forward. On Rviz the grid is set to 20 plane cell count and 1meter per cell. I've changed the resolution, width and height of both costmaps and it's always the same. Any ideas? if you need more info just ask. Salvador |
2015-05-07 09:16:39 -0500 | commented answer | Robot_pose_ekf bad frecuency Yes right now it's inside a room so it is just sending me zero coordinates but when i use it outside (receiving real data from satellites) it have the same rate. |
2015-05-07 08:43:08 -0500 | commented answer | Robot_pose_ekf bad frecuency I'm using an EM406 gps receiver with an integrated antena. It's conected to an ardupilot mega 2.5. The porpouse of it is to use gps navigation using ros navigation stack but i need to make my filter a bit faster for a better connection of both stacks. It's installed in the top of my robot. Salvador |
2015-05-07 08:08:16 -0500 | asked a question | Robot_pose_ekf bad frecuency Hi all, I'm using the robot_pose_ekf whit odometry, imu and gps. It's pretty good by now, the only thing is that it's going too slow. When i make a "rostopic hz" to the odom_combined topic i get this: My .launch file is the following: the "rostopic hz" for odometry, imu and gps is: In the code odomestimation_test.cpp i setup for the filter loop to only check for odometry and imu constantly and check for gps only when new gps data has arrived by commenting a simple line : This give me an error print but it should make my filter faster than the gps (the gps sensors are to slow compared to odometry or imu sensors). If i don't comment this line, it prints a lot of time an info telling that the filter will not update with no change of time (it's obvious because the filter is trying to update at 20hz but the data is being processed at gps rate 1hz). With all of this changes my filter should be processing the information at odometry or imu rate but it still update at ... (more) |
2015-05-06 15:45:37 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2015-05-05 07:35:19 -0500 | asked a question | Move_base with non-rotational robot Hello, I'm using move_base with a non-holonomic, non-rotational robot. Everything is working as it should but i have a big problem and it's that my robot can't make in-place rotations. It's a robot sphere as you can see in the following links: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DlGn... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrpZt... I set the following base local planner parameters: Is there a way to set off the in-place rotations? The other thing is that every time the program send an in-place rotation into the /cmd_vel topic, it puts a value of 1.0 or -1.0 on the angular z as shown below Why is it doing this if i have set the max_vel_theta to 0.2 and the min_vel_theta to -0.2? Also, when passing short distancies to move form base_footprint it send commands to cmd_vel like the following: being this unrelated to the values set in the base_local_planner_params.yaml where min_vel_x is 0.55 and max_vel_theta is 0.2. I've tried changing the min_in_place_vel_theta from 0.0 to 0.5 to see if it takes it as the in-place rotational value but it keep showing me the same thing. Tried setting from true to false the dwa for small values of vel_theta and got the same thing. If anyone have an answer to all of the questions or even a single one it'd be really good!. If you need some more information just ask. Thanks for your time. Salvador |