ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2022-04-17 11:00:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-01-08 06:50:26 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-07-09 13:37:17 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-01-27 08:00:50 -0500 | commented question | ROS not calling callbacks fast enough In simulation, my experience is that time/clock is managed by the simulator and you get a lot of overhead because of thi |
2019-10-09 06:52:59 -0500 | commented question | rviz odometry plugin does not respect keep value I think I see where my problem is coming from. I used the robot frame as "fixed frame", so in this frame, odometry diffe |
2019-10-09 06:52:41 -0500 | commented question | rviz odometry plugin does not respect keep value I think I see where my problem is coming from. I used the robot frame as "fixed frame", so in this frame, odometry diffe |
2019-10-09 06:38:48 -0500 | commented question | rviz odometry plugin does not respect keep value I think I see where my problem is coming from. I used the robot frame as "fixed frame", so in this frame, odometry diffe |
2019-10-09 05:10:38 -0500 | asked a question | rviz odometry plugin does not respect keep value rviz odometry plugin does not respect keep value It seems that if the frame in which the odometry is displayed is the sa |
2016-05-16 00:46:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2016-05-01 14:11:15 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2014-01-28 17:21:47 -0500 | marked best answer | PR2 stacks (and actions) under Diamondback I was trying to get ahead of my colleagues and port my OpenPRS/PR2 library under Diamondback, but it looks like the PR2 stacks and actions have not yet been released under Diamondback. Can somebody confirm? I did the Desktop-Full Install: (Recommended) and include such as |
2014-01-28 17:21:40 -0500 | marked best answer | cancelGoal crashes if called before any goal has been sent... cancelGoal crashes if called before one goal has been sent. if you send at least one goal, then it just reports the problem but keep running. Is this normal? should I fill a ticket? (I know, it is stupid to cancel something which does not yet exist... but it should not crash.) Just to add that cancelAllGoals behaves better and does not crash. It does not even report any error. By the way, where are the source for these functions (cancelGoal and cancelAllGoals), I cannot find them in my ubuntu virtual box appliance. |
2014-01-28 17:21:40 -0500 | marked best answer | Getting error code "string" from ArmNavigationErrorCodes for MoveArm action The MoveArm action returns an error_code in its result: which I can access then with: is there a way to get a string (which is more meaningful than an int) from this error code? something like the ENUM defined here: /opt/ros/cturtle/stacks/motion_planning_common/motion_planning_msgs/msg/ArmNavigationErrorCodes.msg Thanks in advance, |
2013-08-01 04:02:04 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-08-01 04:02:04 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2013-08-01 04:02:04 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2013-01-09 11:22:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2013-01-09 11:22:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-01-09 11:22:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2012-11-08 00:02:38 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2012-11-08 00:02:38 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2012-11-08 00:02:38 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2012-09-19 03:00:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2012-09-19 03:00:49 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2012-08-10 07:30:40 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2011-04-25 14:14:57 -0500 | marked best answer | Action server with more than one action...
There is a difference between limitation to one goal and limitation to one action server.
Just a side remark: if you have separate functionalities which you would ordinarily implement as separate ROS nodes, but which have to run in the same process for technical reasons, you could consider implementing them as nodelets. |
2011-04-19 19:19:51 -0500 | asked a question | Action server with more than one action... I find the notion of action server "limited" to one goal rather restrictive... Is it possible to have a process with more than one action server? For example, imagine that your have a process handling a particular "functionality" on your robot, and you want this process to handle different types of action goals (which need to execute in the same memory space). Could it be possible to define multiple action server in this process, or there will be some problems (such as reentrance, etc). Of course, you could define a "meta" goal and use one of its arguments to define which underlying action/goal to execute. |
2011-03-17 08:36:20 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2011-03-17 01:21:43 -0500 | answered a question | PR2 stacks (and actions) under Diamondback Thanks found them. Just a side question... any particular reason to get WG PR2 Desktop for non WG people? I could not figure out what are the additional packages/stacks in it. |
2011-03-16 08:13:04 -0500 | marked best answer | PR2 stacks (and actions) under Diamondback Please follow the PR2-specific instructions for installing Diamondback: http://www.ros.org/wiki/Robots/PR2/diamondback Installation page for specific robots are linked off the ROS installation page: http://www.ros.org/wiki/ROS/Installation (5 robots and counting). If you're really curious as to what a particular variant contains, you should look at REP 108 for the common entry point descriptions. If you're really, really curious, you can look at the rosinstall file for that variant: |