ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
2021-10-17 06:35:30 -0500 | commented answer | Spurious measurements with a Hokuyo 2D LIDAR Hi PatoInso. I remember that I concluded that the artifacts that you see at the three edges of this Π were caused by the |
2021-10-13 08:26:09 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-10-13 08:26:09 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-09-23 02:17:28 -0500 | edited answer | How can I launch rviz on a remote machine ? What I do and works is this: user_remote@zen $ roslaunch pkg launcher.launch where you can either remove the launch |
2021-09-23 02:17:28 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2021-09-23 02:17:15 -0500 | edited answer | How can I launch rviz on a remote machine ? What I do and works is this: user_remote@zen $ roslaunch pkg launcher.launch where you can either remove the launch |
2021-09-23 02:15:16 -0500 | answered a question | How can I launch rviz on a remote machine ? What I do and works is this: user_remote@zen $ roslaunch pkg launcher.launch where you can either remove the launch |
2021-07-23 05:26:54 -0500 | commented answer | Path planned through unmapped region for goal present inside map. I was also frustrated with this issue. For future reference see https://github.com/ros-planning/navigation/issues/261#is |
2020-07-13 08:52:10 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-07-13 03:59:17 -0500 | answered a question | Spurious measurements with a Hokuyo 2D LIDAR The issue was resolved on its own somehow. |
2020-07-05 05:21:22 -0500 | asked a question | Spurious measurements with a Hokuyo 2D LIDAR Spurious measurements with a Hokuyo 2D LIDAR Hi all, I am experiencing a serious issue with a Hokuyo UST-20LX LIDAR se |
2019-09-26 05:16:08 -0500 | commented answer | Run catkin make with custom compiler Actually the path to the executable should be absolute: set(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER "/usr/bin/clang++") set(CMAKE_C_COMPILER |
2019-09-25 07:50:22 -0500 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2018-09-26 07:57:17 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2018-09-21 06:18:22 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2018-09-19 11:02:19 -0500 | answered a question | frontier_exploration: frontiers inside robot footprint Hey I know it's four years too late but I came across the very same 'Could not find nearby clear cell to start search' |
2018-05-09 18:05:50 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2015-04-08 03:55:00 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-07-01 10:37:11 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-06-01 09:25:12 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-04-19 04:04:01 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2014-04-19 04:03:54 -0500 | commented answer | Global dynamic reconfigure over multiple nodes Hi Sai and thank you. Why oh why didn't I think of this? Due to a last-moment architectural change in my package, I will not be needing a global parameters file right now. Nevertheless, your solution is elegant and I will test it in my spare time. |
2014-04-18 09:47:12 -0500 | asked a question | Global dynamic reconfigure over multiple nodes Hi everybody. I am facing a difficulty designing a dynamic reconfigure node. My package's configuration consists of three nodes, each one with a dynamic reconfigure of its own. I would like to have parameters common to all three nodes, which are changed in all of them by accessing and modifying some kind of "global" dynamic reconfigure parameter regime. Is something like this possible? Thank you in advance. |