| ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
The ROS2 C++ Style Guide seems to be less opinionated on things than ROS1, at least when it comes to constants. It seems the lack of guidance implies that the Google style of kConstantName is the style.
I don't seem to be the only one who interprets it that way https://github.com/ros-tooling/system...
Does anyone else have a comment on the issue?
I agree that the Google style is the way to go - given the lack of guidance. But, for what it's worth, check out this snippet with some constants defined in rclcpp.
static constexpr const char * get_parameters = "get_parameters";
static constexpr const char * get_parameter_types = "get_parameter_types";
static constexpr const char * set_parameters = "set_parameters";
static constexpr const char * set_parameters_atomically = "set_parameters_atomically";
static constexpr const char * describe_parameters = "describe_parameters";
static constexpr const char * list_parameters = "list_parameters";
Asked: 2021-11-09 14:22:34 -0500
Seen: 84 times
Last updated: Nov 09 '21
ROS Answers is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.
