Global_costmap vs static_map
Let's say that we are trying to map a Gazebo
environment using the slam_gmapping
node inside the gmapping
package. Also, assume that move_base
node is running as well.
Also, let's say that, in our Rviz
display, we are visualizing global costmap
, local costmap
and static map
.
I want to know why is there a difference in how the global_costmap
and map
look? Shouldn't global_costmap
appear exactly like map
(and some inflation) ?
Asked by skpro19 on 2021-01-10 17:27:09 UTC
Comments
depends on your configuration. As soon as you add any other layers to the global costmap, this might change. Please share your configuration.
Asked by mgruhler on 2021-01-11 07:17:45 UTC