Ask Your Question
0

why given only the quaternion, a pose can be determined [closed]

asked 2019-12-20 21:35:28 -0600

lyh458 gravatar image

updated 2019-12-21 12:37:02 -0600

jayess gravatar image

line 121, 214, 337. eg,

geometry_msgs::Pose target_pose1;
target_pose1.orientation.w = 1.0;
target_pose1.position.x = 0.28;
target_pose1.position.y = -0.2;
target_pose1.position.z = 0.5;
move_group.setPoseTarget(target_pose1);

question: why given only the quaternion, a pose can be determined??

thanks!

edit retag flag offensive reopen merge delete

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by lyh458
close date 2020-01-06 01:38:48.716052

Comments

Can you please clarify your question ??

Abhishekpg gravatar imageAbhishekpg ( 2019-12-21 00:09:41 -0600 )edit

Sorry for my poor expression. I think a pose of a robot should be determined by both position and quaternion, because the quaternion only contain the orientation information of a joint. The "pose1", "pose2" and "pose3" presented in MoveIt tutorials, move_group_interface_tutorial.cpp only given the quaternion, I am so doubt that how can compute complete infromation of a joint only with this.

lyh458 gravatar imagelyh458 ( 2019-12-21 00:34:39 -0600 )edit
gvdhoorn gravatar imagegvdhoorn ( 2019-12-22 05:06:31 -0600 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
3

answered 2019-12-21 05:15:34 -0600

Abhishekpg gravatar image

updated 2019-12-21 12:37:30 -0600

jayess gravatar image

As you said the pose is determined by both orientation and the position. It is what exactly what they have done in the tutorial

target_pose1.position.x = 0.28;
target_pose1.position.y = -0.2;
target_pose1.position.z = 0.5;

This 3 lines defines the position.

target_pose1.orientation.w = 1.0

this line shows the orientation (quarternion). They haven't defined remaining 3 components of quarternion. So it will be set to default zero value. If you want you can define remaining components as per your requirements as

target_pose1.orientation.x = ...

target_pose1.orientation.y=...

target_pose1.orientation.z = ...

Hope this clarifies your question

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Yeah, thanks! I mistook the "position" for "orientation".

lyh458 gravatar imagelyh458 ( 2019-12-22 21:25:45 -0600 )edit

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2019-12-20 21:30:41 -0600

Seen: 45 times

Last updated: Dec 21 '19