Attention: Answers.ros.org is deprecated as of August the 11th, 2023. Please visit robotics.stackexchange.com to ask a new question. This site will remain online in read-only mode during the transition and into the foreseeable future. Selected questions and answers have been migrated, and redirects have been put in place to direct users to the corresponding questions on Robotics Stack Exchange. Additional details are available here.

What is the alternative to using kinect/ intel realsense/ or any such camera? Is it possible to do software changes and use a normal camera for mapping?

cturtle

asked 2018-05-26 01:38:51 -0500

ashutosh007
1 ●2 ●2 ●3

I want to make TurtleBot2, but I do not have the choice of using kinect or any such dept camera for mapping. I want to know an alternative approach. Thank you.

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

add a comment

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2018-05-27 12:11:36 -0500

PeteBlackerThe3rd

flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

9529 ●30 ●143 ●135 https://www.linkedin.c...

These mapping algorithms are fundamentally designing to use RGB-D depth cameras. There are other 3D reconstruction methods that work with monocular cameras and IMU's but these are far more CPU intensive.

If you read up on structure from motion you will learn about a technique which can work with a single monocular camera, but it does have drawbacks.

edit flag offensive delete link

add a comment

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2018-05-26 01:38:51 -0500

Seen: 708 times

Last updated: May 27 '18

What is the alternative to using kinect/ intel realsense/ or any such camera? Is it possible to do software changes and use a normal camera for mapping? edit

1 Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

What is the alternative to using kinect/ intel realsense/ or any such camera? Is it possible to do software changes and use a normal camera for mapping?