Ask Your Question
3

computing odometry, creating base controller

asked 2016-08-30 08:48:51 -0500

scandrew gravatar image

I am building my own custom robot and am finding it difficult to interface it to ROS (standard odometry and cmd_vel motor control). All I need is to publish odometry, based on the encoder ticks, and translate the twist messages (subscribed) into motor control signals, to be used with Navigation stacks. I found this tutorial - Publish odometry. But it only explains half of the problem. They insert vx, vy and vth values to generate fake odometry of a robot driving in circles. I am trying to calculate real odometry. Can someone help with the code for calculating vx, vy and vth from actual encoder ticks? I will measure the wheel diameter, the amount of ticks per revolution, and the distance between the wheels. But not sure how to implement that in calculating the vx, vy and vth. Intuitively it seems like a simple task, and there are pieces of code on odometry all over ROS tutorials/documentation. But I just can't seem to put it all together. Later, I will also need to find a way to convert geometry/Twist messages to motor power signal. I would really appreciate any help, and believe it will help others in the future.

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2016-08-30 11:10:02 -0500

Mark Rose gravatar image

There are a couple of examples you can look at. First, assuming you can publish the encoder ticks in some way, the differential_drive package has nodes to both publish odometry from encoder ticks and to convert from Twist to motor speeds. All the source is in Python, so it's reasonably easy to read.

Second, if you are using a microcontroller like an Arduino to talk to the hardware, you could use a package like ros_arduino_bridge. It has a ROS node (Python) and an Arduino sketch that communicate to share the work. The Python side does the conversion from ticks to odometry and from Twist to motor control. It also includes a PID controller on the Arduino side. (In my robot I'm using a Pololu A-Star board that fits on top of a Raspberry Pi, for example.)

I think most commercial robots using ROS (PR2, Husky, etc.) use the C++-based hardware interfaces instead. If you're going to follow the same path, you might look at how one of those commercial robots are handling this problem. The examples on the ClearPath site might be a good starting point.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Thank you for such a complete answer. ros_arduino_bridge looks pretty good actually. Unfortunately it is not yet released for kinetic. I am still not sure how that affects the installation/usage in new distros. At the very least I can look at the source files, and try to figure it out on my own

scandrew gravatar image scandrew  ( 2016-08-31 15:38:40 -0500 )edit

You should not have any problems using ros_arduino_bridge for kinetic, but you probably need to get source. I recommend using the fork maintained by Marco Werther. I've contributed code to specify a frame for each sensor, if desired, for example.

Mark Rose gravatar image Mark Rose  ( 2016-08-31 15:59:53 -0500 )edit

Use the indigo-devel branch (even in kinetic).

Mark Rose gravatar image Mark Rose  ( 2016-08-31 16:00:37 -0500 )edit

One more thing: ros_arduino_bridge has support for some distance sensors, publishing as sensor_msgs/Range. You will have to write/get another node that subscribes to the Range values and publishes as a point cloud or laser scan, if you want to use the nav stack, or modify ros_arduino_bridge.

Mark Rose gravatar image Mark Rose  ( 2016-08-31 18:19:45 -0500 )edit

Thanks Mark. I will be using Intel's Realsense depth images for that. But it's good to know there is a library that supports simple sensors as well. For now, I will try to get this to publish odometry and send motor signals to my Teensy 3.1.

scandrew gravatar image scandrew  ( 2016-08-31 18:46:43 -0500 )edit

With a Teensy you might also consider rosserial_arduino and rosserial_python. The Arduino programming model is ROS-like: you publish and subscribe directly from the Arduino side. On smaller microcontrollers memory is an issue, but shouldn't be a problem with the Teensy.

Mark Rose gravatar image Mark Rose  ( 2016-08-31 21:18:54 -0500 )edit

Mark, I already have rosserial_arduino working. Where I had a challenge, was computing the odometry. It even came with an example of publishing odometry on the Arduino side, but it is publishing fake odometry of the robot driving in a circle. If only I could modify it to compute from actual encoders

scandrew gravatar image scandrew  ( 2016-09-01 07:01:06 -0500 )edit

OK, here's what I did previously. I published odometry as ticks from rosserial, then used the differential_drive package to publish odometry on /odom.

Mark Rose gravatar image Mark Rose  ( 2016-09-01 07:26:07 -0500 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2016-08-30 08:48:51 -0500

Seen: 2,240 times

Last updated: Aug 30 '16