Debian install woes
[hide preview] Issues start with the first points on the installation file (comments will be listed with the appropriate numbers)
1.1 Configure your Ubuntu repositories Sorry - - I had used a hard-link to a 'Debian' instruction set so I wouldn't be configuring my ubuntu repositories rather my debian ones. 1.2 Setup your computer to accept software from packages.ros.org . ROS Kinetic ONLY supports Wily (Ubuntu 15.10), Xenial (Ubuntu 16.04) and Jessie (Debian 8) for debian packages.
sudo sh -c 'echo "deb http://packages.ros.org/ros/ubuntu $(lsb_release -sc) main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ros-latest.list'
commands given (please note that Debian 8 (Jessie) is explicitly mentioned as being supported) don't give any kind of result like what might be wanted. - - vis there is no directory in sources.list.d called ros-latest.list and the command hangs there and doesn't 'do' anything to a somewhat noob the phrase '$(lsb_release -sc) main' doesn't mean much - - - it took me a while to understand that I needed to have 'xenial' here (a space after .../ubuntu) followed by a space and then the word 'main'. 1.3Set up your key
apt-key adv --keyserver hkp://ha.pool.sks-keyservers.net:80 --recv-key 0xB01FA116
gets
Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --homedir /tmp/tmp.6yfkBfPICO --no-auto-check-trustdb --trust-model always --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-jessie-automatic.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-jessie-security-automatic.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-jessie-stable.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-squeeze-automatic.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-squeeze-stable.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-wheezy-automatic.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-wheezy-stable.gpg --keyserver hkp://ha.pool.sks-keyservers.net:80 --recv-key 0XB01FA116 gpg: "0XB01FA116" not a key ID: skipping
which somehow doesn't seem to be a useful result
did the apt-get update - - just in case something useful might be there and then
next the command aptitude install ros-kinetic-desktop-full was used with the result (aptitude deals with dependencies better therefore its use)
aptitude install ros-kinetic-desktop-full The following NEW packages will be installed: cmake{a} cmake-data{a} comerr-dev{a} fltk1.3-doc{a} fluid{a} fonts-lyx{a} gir1.2-gtk-2.0{a} graphviz{a} hddtemp{a} hdf5-helpers{a} icu-devtools{a} krb5-multidev{a} libapr1-dev{a} libaprutil1-dev{a} libarmadillo4{a} libarpack2{a} libatk1.0-dev{a} libavcodec-dev{a} libavformat-dev{a} libavresample-dev{a} libavutil-dev{a} libboost-all-dev{a} libboost-atomic-dev{a} libboost-atomic1.55-dev{a} libboost-atomic1.55.0{a} libboost-chrono-dev{a} libboost-chrono1.55-dev{a} libboost-chrono1.55.0{a} libboost-context-dev{a} libboost-context1.55-dev{a} libboost-context1.55.0{a} libboost-coroutine-dev{a} libboost-coroutine1.55-dev{a} libboost-date-time-dev{a} libboost-date-time1.55-dev{a} libboost-dev{a} libboost-exception-dev{a} libboost-exception1.55-dev{a} libboost-filesystem-dev{a} libboost-filesystem1.55-dev{a} libboost-filesystem1.55.0{a} libboost-graph-dev{a} libboost-graph-parallel-dev{a} libboost-graph-parallel1.55-dev{a} libboost-graph-parallel1.55.0{a} libboost-graph1.55-dev{a} libboost-graph1.55.0{a} libboost-iostreams-dev{a} libboost-iostreams1.55-dev{a} libboost-locale-dev{a} libboost-locale1.55-dev{a} libboost-locale1.55.0{a} libboost-log-dev{a} libboost-log1.55-dev{a} libboost-log1.55.0{a} libboost-math-dev{a} libboost-math1.55-dev ...
I think we'd all be more than willing to help you, but as it is right now, your question is rather badly formatted, and thus very hard to understand. Could you fix that first? And maybe add a summary at the top, describing very succinctly what exactly doesn't work, and what you expected.
Part of the problem is that entering information here the formatting is modified so it makes the reading of what is written very very difficult. But then I was not involved in those choices. Trying to leave a comment to increse the usability and there is no room here to write!
the wiki uses a different markup system than this site, yes. But using the Preformatted code button (like you did in your own answer) would help?
Sorry - - didn't realize there was a 'Preformatted code' button. Just pushed and prodded until what the output was was what I was happy with. Just found the button - - never saw one of those before!!