Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

answered 2013-07-16 15:42:49 -0600

joq gravatar image

The 64E rate is an experimental result with our non-S2 device. I don't have access to an S2. Can you confirm the numbers above with it?

The 64E rate is an experimental result with our non-S2 device. I don't have access to an S2. Can you confirm the numbers above with it?it? If necessary we can add another model designation for the S2.

The 64E rate is an experimental result with our non-S2 device. I don't have access to an S2. Can you confirm the numbers above with it? If necessary we can add another model designation for the S2.

Update: a patch would be great. I think it'll be straightforward, so you can concentrate on the github mechanics. Just ask, if you need help.

The only 64E S2 user I've heard from was a couple of years ago. He provided a patch for his angles configuration extensions. Since you have access to an S2, we should set up a unit test of some kind. Perhaps you can supply the angles configuration for your device. The velodyne_pointcloud/params/utexas_64e.yaml is for our older, non-S2 device.

The 64E rate is an experimental result with our non-S2 device. I don't have access to an S2. Can you confirm the numbers above with it? If necessary we can add another model designation for the S2.

Update: a patch would be great. I think it'll be straightforward, so you can concentrate on the github mechanics. Just ask, if you need help.

The only other 64E S2 user I've heard from was a couple of years ago. He provided a patch for his angles configuration extensions. Since you have access to an S2, we should set up a unit test of some kind. Perhaps you can supply the angles configuration for your device. The velodyne_pointcloud/params/utexas_64e.yaml is for our older, non-S2 device.

The 64E rate is an experimental result with our non-S2 device. I don't have access to an S2. Can you confirm the numbers above with it? If necessary we can add another model designation for the S2.

Update: a patch would be great. I think it'll be straightforward, so you can concentrate on the github mechanics. Just ask, if you need help.

The only other 64E S2 user I've heard from was a couple of years ago. He provided a patch for his angles configuration extensions. Since you have access to an S2, we should set up a unit test of some kind. Perhaps you can supply the angles configuration for your device. The velodyne_pointcloud/params/utexas_64e.yaml is for our older, non-S2 device.

Update2: for anyone using an earlier version of the driver without this fix, here is a work-around for the 64E S2 or S2.1:

$ rosrun velodyne_driver velodyne_node _npackets:=348 _rpm:=600

The 64E rate is an experimental result with our non-S2 device. I don't have access to an S2. Can you confirm the numbers above with it? If necessary we can add another model designation for the S2.

Update: a patch would be great. I think it'll be straightforward, so you can concentrate on the github mechanics. Just ask, if you need help.

The only other 64E S2 user I've heard from was a couple of years ago. He provided a patch for his angles configuration extensions. Since you have access to an S2, we should set up a unit test of some kind. Perhaps you can supply the angles configuration for your device. The velodyne_pointcloud/params/utexas_64e.yaml is for our older, non-S2 device.

Update2: for anyone using an earlier version of the driver without this fix, here is a work-around for the 64E S2 or S2.1:

$ rosrun velodyne_driver velodyne_node _npackets:=348 _npackets:=384 _rpm:=600

EDIT: corrected npackets typo (was 348)