ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

My aptitude installed ROS auto-updated today, and I am experiencing further breakages. Now when I run my code I get the runtime error: This is a simple fix. Just set cv_bridge::CvImage::encoding to 'bgr8' rather than '8UC3'. However I have seen '8UC3' syntax used (a while ago) in official ROS code. Perhaps either users should be made aware of changes that break backwards compatibility, or the person committing these changes should be made aware?

My aptitude installed ROS auto-updated today, and I am experiencing further breakages. Now when I run my code I get the runtime error: error:

This is a simple fix. Just set cv_bridge::CvImage::encoding to 'bgr8' rather than '8UC3'. However I have seen '8UC3' syntax used (a while ago) in official ROS code. Perhaps either users should be made aware of changes that break backwards compatibility, or the person committing these changes should be made aware?

click to hide/show revision 3
Bug preventing proper display

My aptitude installed ROS auto-updated today, and I am experiencing further breakages. Now when I run my code I get the runtime error:

ERROR: Unable to convert 8UC3 image to bgr8: Unsupported conversion from [8UC3] to [bgr8]

This is a simple fix. Just set cv_bridge::CvImage::encoding to 'bgr8' rather than '8UC3'. However I have seen '8UC3' syntax used (a while ago) in official ROS code. Perhaps either users should be made aware of changes that break backwards compatibility, or the person committing these changes should be made aware?

click to hide/show revision 4
Added that old bag files are now broken

My aptitude installed ROS auto-updated today, and I am experiencing further breakages. Now when I run my code I get the runtime error:

ERROR: Unable to convert 8UC3 image to bgr8: Unsupported conversion from [8UC3] to [bgr8]

This is a simple fix. fix for future code. Just set cv_bridge::CvImage::encoding to 'bgr8' rather than '8UC3'. However I have seen '8UC3' syntax used (a while ago) in official ROS code. code.

These ROS changes have rendered my old bag files unusable, whilst providing no extra functionality at all. Perhaps either users should be made aware of changes that break backwards compatibility, or the person committing these changes should be made aware?