ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
1 | initial version |
My aptitude installed ROS auto-updated today, and I am experiencing further breakages. Now when I run my code I get the runtime error: This is a simple fix. Just set cv_bridge::CvImage::encoding to 'bgr8' rather than '8UC3'. However I have seen '8UC3' syntax used (a while ago) in official ROS code. Perhaps either users should be made aware of changes that break backwards compatibility, or the person committing these changes should be made aware?
2 | No.2 Revision |
My aptitude installed ROS auto-updated today, and I am experiencing further breakages. Now when I run my code I get the runtime error:
error:
This is a simple fix. Just set cv_bridge::CvImage::encoding to 'bgr8' rather than '8UC3'. However I have seen '8UC3' syntax used (a while ago) in official ROS code. Perhaps either users should be made aware of changes that break backwards compatibility, or the person committing these changes should be made aware?
3 | Bug preventing proper display |
My aptitude installed ROS auto-updated today, and I am experiencing further breakages. Now when I run my code I get the runtime error:
ERROR: Unable to convert 8UC3 image to bgr8: Unsupported conversion from [8UC3] to [bgr8]
This is a simple fix. Just set cv_bridge::CvImage::encoding to 'bgr8' rather than '8UC3'. However I have seen '8UC3' syntax used (a while ago) in official ROS code. Perhaps either users should be made aware of changes that break backwards compatibility, or the person committing these changes should be made aware?
4 | Added that old bag files are now broken |
My aptitude installed ROS auto-updated today, and I am experiencing further breakages. Now when I run my code I get the runtime error:
ERROR: Unable to convert 8UC3 image to bgr8: Unsupported conversion from [8UC3] to [bgr8]
This is a simple fix. fix for future code. Just set cv_bridge::CvImage::encoding to 'bgr8' rather than '8UC3'. However I have seen '8UC3' syntax used (a while ago) in official ROS code. code.
These ROS changes have rendered my old bag files unusable, whilst providing no extra functionality at all. Perhaps either users should be made aware of changes that break backwards compatibility, or the person committing these changes should be made aware?