ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
1 | initial version |
2 | No.2 Revision |
Afaict, there is no libcurlpp-dev
in the current rosdep
db.
The only keys which contain the libcurl
substring are libcurl
and libcurl-dev
.
libcurlpp-dev
does not exist. Only curlpp-dev
(here).
Seeing the traceback though, it would appear this is not a problem with the rosdep
side of things, but while actually installing packages (in this case the .deb
): curlpp-dev
maps to libcurlpp-dev
for debian
. According to this, that package only exists in bullseye
.
3 | No.3 Revision |
Afaict, there is no libcurlpp-dev
in the current rosdep
db.
The only keys which contain the libcurl
substring are libcurl
and libcurl-dev
.
libcurlpp-dev
does not exist. Only curlpp-dev
(here).
Seeing the traceback though, it would appear this is not a problem with the rosdep
side of things, but while actually installing packages (in this case the .deb
): curlpp-dev
maps to libcurlpp-dev
for debian
. According to this, that package only exists in bullseye
., bookworm
and sid
(if you include Debian Unstable).
4 | No.4 Revision |
Afaict, there is no libcurlpp-dev
in the current rosdep
db.
The only keys which contain the libcurl
substring are libcurl
and libcurl-dev
.
libcurlpp-dev
does not exist. Only curlpp-dev
(here).
Seeing the traceback though, it would appear this is not a problem with the rosdep
side of things, but while actually installing packages (in this case the .deb
): curlpp-dev
maps to libcurlpp-dev
for debian
. According to this, that package only exists in bullseye
, bookworm
and sid
(if you include Debian Unstable).
If it doesn't exist in other releases, the curlpp-dev
key might have to be specialised further for the debian
OS entry.